2005 S Finance - Cherry, Bekaert & ITolland, L.L.P Audit Contract for the June 30, 2005 Fiscal Year

Browse Search

FEE Financial Audit -Our fees for these services will be based upon our customary billing practices at the time of the engagement. Bills for services will be rendered as work progresses and are due within 15 days from invoice date. A service charge will be added to past due accounts equal to 1 1 /2% per month (18% annual rate) on the previous month's balance less payments received during the month, with a minimum charge of $2.00 per month. The fee for our audit as described in this letter will not exceed $71,000. This fee is based on anticipated cooperation from your personnel and the assumption that unexpected circumstances will not be encountered during the audit. If significant additional time is necessary, we will discuss it with you and arrive at a new fee estimate before we incur the additional costs. Any modification to the fee shall be in writing and signed by both parties. You agree to pay all costs of collection (including reasonable attorneys' fees) that we may incur in connection with the collection of unpaid invoices. The fees are based on auditing standards effective as of the date of this engagement letter. If new auditing standards are issued and are effective for the period under audit described in this engagement letter that require additional audit procedures that were not known at the date of this engagement letter, we will estimate the impact of any new such standard on the nature, timing and extent of our planned audit procedures and will communicate with you concerning the scope of the additional procedures and the estimated fees. LIMITATIONS OF THE AUDITING PROCESS Our audit will include procedures designed to obtain reasonable assurance of detecting misstatements due to errors or fraud that are material to the financial statements. Absolute assurance is not attainable because of the nature of audit evidence and the characteristics of fraud. For example, audits performed in accordance with GAAS are based on the concept of selective testing of the data being examined and are, therefore, subject to the limitation that material misstatements due to errors or fraud, if they exist, may not be detected. Also, an audit is not designed to detect matters that are immaterial to the financial statements. In addition, an audit conducted in accordance with GARS does not include procedures specifically designed to detect illegal acts having an indirect effect (e.g., violations of fraud and abuse statutes that result in fines or penalties being imposed on the entity) on the financial statements. As required by the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular A-133, and the State Single Audit Implementation Act our audit will include tests of transactions related to major federal and State award programs for compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the provisions of contracts and grant agreements. Because an audit is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute assurance and because we will not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that material errors, fraud, other illegal acts, or noncompliance may exist and not be detected by us. In addition, an audit is not designed to detect immaterial errors, fraud, or other illegal acts or illegal acts that do not have a direct effect on the basic financial statements or to major programs. It should be recognized that our audit generally provides no assurance that illegal acts will be detected, and only reasonable assurance that illegal acts having a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts will be detected. However, we will inform you with respect to material errors and fraud, or illegal acts that come to our attention during the course of our audit. We will include such matters in the reports as required for a Single Audit. If, for any reason, we are unable to complete the audit, or are unable to form or have not formed an opinion on the basic financial statements, we may decline to express an opinion or decline to issue a report as a result of the engagement.