Browse
Search
Minutes 06-08-2010
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Minutes 06-08-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2016 3:05:10 PM
Creation date
10/6/2010 3:03:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/8/2010
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-08-2010 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 06-08-2010 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 06-08-2010 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 06-08-2010 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 06-08-2010 - 2a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 06-08-2010 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 06-08-2010 - 2b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 06-08-2010 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 06-08-2010 - 2c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 06-08-2010 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 06-08-2010 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 06-08-2010 - Budget Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Subtotal 111,755.16 <br /> Active Projects From ERCD & <br /> Parks <br /> 20011 Lands Legacy 450,000 <br /> 20003 Twin Creeks Park 300,000 <br /> 20030 Central Recreation 75,000 <br /> Subtotal 825,000.00 <br /> Funds Available from Projects TOTAL $1,697,282. <br /> Commissioner Gordon has previously asked the staff questions about this item, and <br /> staff had prepared a handout with answers. For purposes of clarification, Commissioner <br /> Gordon prepared and distributed a revised handout with edited questions from her, but with <br /> the answers from staff of course remaining the same. <br /> Michael Talbert said that on May 18th the Board acted to appropriate $1.7 million from <br /> General Fund balance and this has been done. Those projects are now in better shape. <br /> When this process was first started, there were 84 projects that were still active and not closed <br /> for many years. Also, on May 181h, the Board closed 26 existing projects, created $245,500 <br /> used for future needs. Attachment 1 includes those projects that have been closed out. <br /> Commissioner Nelson said that the Library Task Force is misnamed. He said that the <br /> original plan set aside this reserve account to put in $50,000/year for a southwest library and <br /> future library needs. He asked why this was being earmarked and not actually put aside for a <br /> library. Michael Talbert said that there would be many needs over the years, some <br /> unexpected; and very little revenue streams in the near future. <br /> Commissioner Nelson wants to figure out a way to keep this earmarked and continue <br /> adding to it so that when an opportunity arises there is money somewhere to take advantage <br /> of the opportunity. <br /> Commissioner Gordon suggested putting 14 projects in the County Capital Projects <br /> Fund and put the 15th one (southwest library and future library needs) in the County Capital <br /> Reserve Fund. <br /> Michael Talbert said that in 2b he is recommending to put $200,000 in the capital <br /> reserve and earmark $50,000 for the southwest library. <br /> Frank Clifton said that this is okay as long as you do not start moving money around <br /> again like they used to do among projects, which became an accounting nightmare. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz verified that the County now has more capital projects on the <br /> books and not enough money to pay for them. He said that if the County Commissioners are <br /> earmarking money for specific purposes, then they need to track it, but he also agrees that it <br /> does not have to be tracked to a separate reserve fund, just earmarked. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs thanked the staff for the more efficient method for doing the <br /> capital projects but he has the same concerns as Commissioner Nelson —that the County <br /> Commissioners need some way to mark the path for earmarking funds for a particular project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.