Orange County NC Website
Commissioner Jacobs made reference to Section 2.2.8 and said that if someone <br /> withdraws, they should not have to wait a year. <br /> Frank Clifton said that this is a change from the existing process. He said that <br /> there needs to be a process. He understands the need to work with the development <br /> community, but this frustrates the intent of the public if the public hearings are delayed, <br /> etc. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that he is an advocate of the public having adequate <br /> time to weigh in, but he has noticed that staff will try and work with people right up until <br /> the public hearing. He said that if staff tells a developer that something has to be <br /> changed the day before the public hearing and the developer does not want it, he does <br /> not understand why the developer should be penalized for a year while it is reworked. <br /> Frank Clifton said that the issue is not the time but that there is continuity and a <br /> process in place. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that the withdrawal should be six months. <br /> Chair Foushee asked staff to take this under consideration and provide options. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz asked about the date of the denial and if it is the date that <br /> someone withdraws or the date of the public hearing. Perdita Holtz said that it is the <br /> date of the withdrawal. Commissioner Yuhasz said that this needs to be indicated. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs made reference to Section 2.2.6-c and the second <br /> sentence, and said that it should say, "If the application is not acted upon within this <br /> timeframe." <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz made reference to 2.3.3-c and said that it refers to 2.3.1- <br /> b, which is a flowchart. Perdita Holtz said that this should be 2.3.2-b. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that the heading for Section 2.3.2 should be General <br /> Requirements or General Standards. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz made reference to Section 2.3.5 and the required public <br /> hearing and asked why this was not a quarterly public hearing. Perdita Holtz said that <br /> this is the existing language and it can be changed to the quarterly public hearing. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs made reference to notice requirements for public hearings <br /> and said that as part of the County notifying the public, the County website could be <br /> used. He said that this could be part of the notification process. <br /> Perdita Holtz said that the County could not use the website in lieu of published <br /> notifications. <br /> Craig Benedict said that a lot of the notification statutes are becoming archaic. <br /> He will be bringing some ideas forward about how to be more efficient in this area. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz made reference to Section 2.3.8-b-1 and the fully- <br /> dimensioned map, which is not defined anywhere. He asked that this be defined <br /> somewhere. He suggested having some flexibility here, depending on the size of the <br /> amendment. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz made reference to Section 2.4.3 on page 2-12 and items <br /> 4, 5, and 6 and said that it should say "location of the proposed driveway, the proposed <br /> septic system, etc." because those may not exist at the time the plot plan was drawn. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs made reference to Zoning Compliance Permits and said <br /> that there is no reference to the solid waste process of requiring that deconstruction be <br /> considered versus demolition. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz made reference to page 2-13, Section 2.5.2, and site- <br /> specific development plans and said that in some other location it talks about plans <br /> being prepared by the appropriately licensed professional. He thinks that this needs to <br /> include architects also. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs made reference to Section 2.5.3-h and Best Practices, <br /> Urban vs. Rural Clusters. He said that the Board has talked about differentiating traffic <br />