Orange County NC Website
Attachmnelt <br />(.pagve 2 of -1) <br />accommodate forecast, growth in student mqm�ership. T he membership numbers reflect an <br />aG,.gal student count as defined in the MOU. The capacity that is noted, Is from last years <br />SAPFCT AC certification. <br />The SAPFOTAC analytical work would normally take place in the January - February Idmeframe, <br />but was accelerated for 2004-05 at the request of the 80GQ because: the results of the <br />SAPFOTAC analysis of updated student membership projeetions, Will have a sTgni-ficant impact <br />on major capital funding decisions that the BOCC will need to make in the very near future. <br />SAPFOT AC is tasked to produce an annual report for the governing boards: of each SAPFO <br />partner. The full annual SAPFOTAC report will be completed in early 2005. <br />Building Capacity <br />There has been extensive discussion among the governing boards and staff of the CoLmty and <br />school systems throughout 2004 regarding the certij-:-c ion of individual school building <br />capacifties. The State of North Carolina has Jalkan urillateral action during the past tso years, to <br />dictate to local school administrative units that the average class size throughout a school <br />district for grades K-3 must be reduced to I teacher for every 21 students. As the BOCC has <br />rioted, this has in. effect created an told coded mandate for county governments to provide <br />additional school space with no time to plan for the funding and construction of new space. <br />--oliowing dis <br />F cussion on the subject at a November 2004 work session, the County Attorney, <br />examined the requirements for reduced class size and the possible sanctions or other <br />ramifications that might face any school system that is unable to comply with the average crass <br />size manda-leS. The accompanying letter frGin,"he Attorney outlines the results of his research. <br />As provided for in the SAPFO Section 1.b "-..'bUJldi,-1g capacity' will be determined— by a joint <br />action of the School Board and the BOCC.- Ther ' efore, until there is a 'joint action' agreeing to <br />the impact, of now State rules for classroom size in grades K-3, the existing capacity levels are <br />being . used for capaolty/membership projection comparisons. <br />Implications of' Updated Ten Year Student Membership Projections <br />SAPFO provides that the County must provilde funding and a school system must construct new <br />school space so that the Level of Service (LOS) for elementary school space vAl not exce-ad <br />105% of capacity across an entire school district- The updated ten-year student ma:rnbarship <br />proi-ctions prepared by SAPFOTAC and rafleGted on the a=mpa.nylng:charts Indicate that, <br />absent the creation of new seats, the 10511/o level of service would be exceed-aid at the <br />elp-maritrary level in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools for academic year 209-10. <br />Accordingly, adherence to SAPFO provisions will require that now permanent elementary <br />school space be avalfable for the beginning: of that school year. The needed opening date has <br />shifted back three, years compared to the 20007 opening contemplated in last year's student <br />membership projections. aloMing growth produced only minor enrollment increases at the <br />elementary level in the Chapel Hill-Carrbo.ro Schools during the current school year. <br />GHCCS Middle School #5 Is projected to be neaded in 2013-2014. 800 new seats w1ft become <br />sivallable virith the anticipated opening of CHCCS High School #3 in August 2007. Bused on the <br />updated student membership projections, there is no other ad. Mona[ high school space needed <br />within the ten-year planning period. <br />62 <br />