Browse
Search
RES-2005-016 Orange County's 2005 Legislative Agenda
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Resolutions
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
RES-2005-016 Orange County's 2005 Legislative Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2011 3:52:19 PM
Creation date
10/4/2010 1:29:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/1/2005
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Resolution
Agenda Item
8b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-01-2005-8b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 03-01-2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION <br />MEMORAI~IDUM <br />To: County Commissioners <br />From: Historic Preservation Commission <br />Date: March 1, 2005 <br />Subject: NC Rehab Code <br />Copies: Cathleen Turner, Executive Director, Alliance for Historic Hillsborough <br /> Margaret Schucker, Staff, Hillsborough Historic District Commission <br /> John Link, Orange County Manager <br /> David Stancil, Environment & Resource Conservation Director <br /> Craig Benedict, Planning & Inspections Director <br /> Susan Mellott, Code Enforcement Supervisor <br />What is it? <br />On August 17, 2001, Governor Easley signed into law the North Carolina Rehabilitation Pilot <br />Code (Rehab Code). A distinct and separate building code from the standard 2002 North <br />Carolina State Building Code, the new Rehab Code was developed after the success of similar <br />codes in New Jersey and Maryland. It is designed to focus on the particular issues associated <br />with existing buildings to allow contractors to meet building code standards, without having to <br />modify the key elements that make historic buildings significant and give older buildings <br />character. <br />Why is it important? <br />One of the most frustrating aspects of historic preservation (restoring, preserving, and <br />renovating older buildings) is balancing code requirements with the need to retain a building's <br />historic and architectural integrity. Certain features in older buildings, such as doors and stair <br />components (tread depth, riser height, baluster spacing, handrail height) typically do not meet <br />current building code requirements. These are the same features that contribute to the <br />architectural significance of a building. If a property owner with a federal plantation house, for <br />example, wishes to renovate a room he or she may have to replace the door with astandard- <br />size unit. Even if the new door is a custom-made reproduction, the owner may have to enlarge <br />the opening, rebuild the doorjamb, and reproduce a line of molding to match the existing trim. <br />Not only will the modified door opening no longer contribute to the historic value of the house, it <br />may actually detract from it. <br />Another common difficulty with older buildings and the building code is the tendency for one <br />issue to lead to another. Property owners seeking approval to repair one minor area are often <br />required to bring other areas up to code as well. This situation can actually lead to more safety <br />issues, because property owners try to avoid getting a permit in the first place. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.