Browse
Search
Minutes - 19911007
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Minutes - 19911007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2016 11:08:19 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:08:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/7/1991
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r� <br /> 589 <br /> Eddie Kirk cited the Ordinance requirements as listed in <br /> Article 8.2 .2 . Mr. Davis feels that the granting of this SUP will <br /> enhance the salability of the property. <br /> Vic Knight, local appraiser, stated that he was hired to <br /> evaluate the impact that this particular use would have on the subject <br /> property. With regard to the value aspect as it pertains to the <br /> adjoining and contiguous properties, he looked at the sales of <br /> surrounding properties of two other bed and breakfast establishments and <br /> how they may have been impacted by the granting of a SUP. What he <br /> determine was that the value impact seems to be negligible or nil. Mr. <br /> Davis ' property was not used as a comparable because his property did <br /> not change ownership. The use of the property as a bed and breakfast <br /> would cause a significantly less impact than• other uses might on this <br /> property in that particular location. <br /> Mr. Davis stated he doesn't want something in his neighborhood <br /> that is not needed. <br /> Chair Carey stated that it would be Mr. Davis ' responsibility <br /> to present evidence that the value of his property would decrease if <br /> this proposal is approved. After this public hearing, the Planning <br /> Board may receive and take into consideration any written evidence, <br /> including that which would be contrary to what has been presented. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by <br /> Commissioner Gordon that the application be referred to the Planning <br /> Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of CommissionerE <br /> no sooner than November 4 , 1991 and no later than December 4 , 1991. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> VII. REPORTS <br /> A. HILLSBOROUGH REOUEST TO PURCHASE OWASA SIXTEEN INCH WATER LINE <br /> This report is in response to Hillsborough' s request to OWASA <br /> to purchase the OWASA sixteen inch water line which has been used to <br /> transport water between Hillsborough and OWASA. In answer to a question <br /> from Commissioner Gordon, Paul Thames stated that OWASA questioned that <br /> if Hillsborough got control of the line and they developed in the area <br /> served by the line to such an extent that the demand for water used up <br /> a large portion of the carrying capacity of that line and OWASA needed <br /> to get water,in or out of Hillsborough through that line, how would that <br /> be accomplished. Thames stated that in any event Hillsborough would <br /> have to have a new pump station built at the boundary of the service <br /> area because OWASA' s existing pumps would not be able to pump into a <br /> high pressure zone. This pump station would need to be designed to <br /> overcome the high pressure zone and be able to run enough water through <br /> to satisfy the Hillsborough service area water demand plus be able to <br /> carry the water from OWASA to Hillsborough. He feels that this pump <br /> station can be designed to OWASA's satisfaction. The problem is that <br /> building a pump station would be costly and the feasibility of buying <br /> this line comes into question. Hillsborough may be better off <br /> financially to build a 12" line instead of buying this 16" line. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.