ORD-2006-105 - Piedmont Electric Membership Corporation (PEMC) Planned Development (PD-OI) and Special Use Permit, Class A

Browse Search

1-13 so that they can be aware of it and look at it. My recollection is that this was the middle of the day; as Commissioner Halkiotis said, he thought it was something else, 'a car dealership. How is the public supposed to know any different? We need to look at our rules and regulations for those and figure out a better way so people are alert to what's going on. I predict that when this tower is built that people will say, "Wow, that's really tall, and why didn't l know about this, "'and all that. I'm not saying that Piedmont didn't comply, I am just saying that we need to revisit our regulations to make sure that people are aware of what's happening. I remember when we were talking about the Board of Adjustment having to deal with these issues, we were talking at time about providing a consultant or somebody else who could look into these issues before going to the public. And I seem to think that that would be true of the Commissioners too. We need to assist the public a little bit more in trying to understand what's happening, and somebody knowledgeable that they can go to that will inform them of these technical aspects. Commissioner Carey: I thought we would increase the pace if we could hire a consultant to represent and ask questions. Craig Benedict: We have a representative of the County here tonight, the Center for Municipal Solutions, Mr. Rusty Monroe, is part of thatprocess that the Board suggested a few years ago. The fees from the Piedmont tower were partially given to pay for the consultant and one of the criteria we have is that this is one of the only engineering solutions to locating the tower. We have used the expertise of the Center for Municipal Solutions and their memo is in the file here, on page 142 -144 that says that it meets the standards of our land development code. So we do have that type of expertise. We are further in the Telecommunications Master Plan effort and we may use the same consultant with other monies that have been budgeted this year to create our telecommunication network for other public safety purposes. I will pursue that with the Interim County Manager. Commissioner Carey: Will the consultant be available to our Planning Board as they deliberate on this. Craig Benedict: Yes. Commissioner Gordon: Is the consultant going to be available to the Board? He should be sworn in and we should be able to ask questions. Chair Jacobs: I agree with Commissioner Gordon. I think that the consultant should have been introduced at the very beginning, and we do not have any problem with Piedmont Electric, but.if we're doing the process, I think we need to know that our expert is here and that he's available for questions. He or she may have.comments aboutthe application and can be here as a resource and be identified as a resource to the Planning Board and to the Board of Commissioners, not to discover it in the discussion. And also, I agree with Commissioner Gordon that the fact that there are no citizens here may mean that nobody has any problems, or it may mean that our notification policies are inadequate. And my guess is that it is probably a combination of both., and that one small period of a balloon that was notified to people within 500 feet, especially for a tower of this height, may not be adequate notice to the public. Renee Price: I had a question with regards to the applicant proposing a tower for public safety. Does the Planning Board or does the County Commissioners have the responsibility of deciding what is a public need, or is that the responsibility of the applicant. Is that something that should be assumed? Geof Gledhill: It is the burden of the applicant to prove that it is a public necessity if that's their intention, and if they do not prove that, and that finding can't be made, then it's the burden of the applicant to prove the maintenance of property values in.the absence of a public necessity.