Orange County NC Website
16 <br />~~~ <br />Located at the foot of Chesapeake Bay, Mathews County has recognized the <br />~! importance of all the waterways-headwaters, intermittent streams and <br />wetlands that flow into the Bay and past their doorstep. On May 26, 2009, <br />r hi f u ervisorJ nin B rn h Board f rvi r <br />under the leade s o S a e u s t e o Su a so s <br />p p p <br />adopted the following resolution. Supervisor Burns says she is happy for their <br />resolution to be used as a model for other counties. <br />,. ~ ~~~.L <br />~- <br />._ <br />.~~. <br />,_ <br />_ T. <br />- -.~_ <br />Mathews County websKe <br />RESOLUTION: Clarification of Federal Jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act <br />Whereas, wetlands are among the most productive ecosystems in the world, providing habitats for many kinds of <br />plants and animals, including more than one-third of the United States' threatened and endangered species; and <br />Whereas, wetlands play an important role in providing a number of ecological services, including flood protection <br />and control; erosion and sedimentation prevention and control; surface water filtration; groundwater recharge; <br />and support for economic activity that depends on healthy populations offish and wildlife; and <br />Whereas, wetlands provide opportunities for recreation, education, and research as well as measurable economic <br />contributions to the Chesapeake Bay Region; and <br />Whereas, the maritime heritage and the future of Mathews County, Virginia, are inextricably linked to water quality <br />and the health of the Chesapeake Bay, and <br />Whereas, 70-90% of fish and shellfish in the Bay are dependent on wetlands for a life cycle phase, and <br />Whereas, more than one-half of the natural Chesapeake Bay Region wetlands have already been filled in or <br />drained for agriculture, urban uses, shoreline development, recreation and resource extraction, compromising <br />and sometimes eliminating the natural storage and cleansing functions of wetlands around the Bay; and <br />Whereas, the Clean Water Act's jurisdiction over wetlands and all waters of the United States has been made <br />uncertain by U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) v. United <br />States Army Corps of Engineers and related cases Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States; and an <br />estimated 20 million acres of wetlands and 500 of all stream miles in the lower 48 states are jeopardized by the <br />Supreme Court decisions, and <br />Whereas, despite the issuance by the U.S. Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency of <br />supplementary guidance concerning Clean Water Act jurisdiction, confusion over federal jurisdiction under the <br />Clean Water Act persists, adding substantial delays to valid permit actions and otherwise undermining the ability <br />of the federal government and the states (whose wetland programs are legally intertwined with the Clean Water <br />Act) to protect intermittent streams and isolated wetlands, placing large areas of Chesapeake Region wetlands <br />and streams at risk of pollution and destruction. <br />Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Board of Supervisors of Mathews County, Virginia, supports continued and <br />consistent definitions of federal jurisdiction of wetlands and water of the United States; and <br />Be It Fnally Resolved, that the Board of Supervisors of Mathews County, Virginia, encourages the U.S. Congress to <br />act immediately to reestablish Clean Water Act jurisdiction to the full scope of waters protected prior to the recent <br />Supreme Court decisions, and to work in cooperation with the Chesapeake Region States and other interested <br />organizations to resolve Clean Water Act jurisdiction issues. <br />13 Clean Water For All: County Leaders Speak Out for Clean Water <br />