Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-21-2010 - 4g
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 09-21-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-21-2010 - 4g
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2010 8:46:39 AM
Creation date
9/20/2010 8:46:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/21/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4g
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-21-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
RES-2010-072 Resolution – Clarification of Federal Jurisdiction Under Clean Water Act
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br />whether the water body at issue has a chemical, physical, or biological effect <br />on a traditionally navigable water. <br />In the summer of 2007, St Louis County was faced with a decision by the <br />Army Corps of Engineers that required them to undergo jurisdictional <br />determinations on 36 separate wetlands, some as small as 0.007 acres, for a <br />4.74 mile-long road project For public safety reasons, the county needed to <br />fix the road; for complications due to the Supreme Court's interpretation of the <br />Clean Water Actin the Rapanos case, the Army Corps felt it needed to <br />evaluate each of the 36 wetlands individually. <br />'' ~ " ; ~"~ ~;'""` "" According to former St. Louis County Public Works Director/County Engineer Marcus J. Hall, <br />~~ ~ ~ ~` ' in his testimony to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure in 2007, the <br />~~ ~ y` ~~ , county anticipated a year long delay due to jurisdictional determinations. He said, "I <br />~~ believe that the Rapanos and Carabell decisions (or non-decisions) have thrown the federal <br />regulatory agencies into turmoil and both the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers into a <br />~~ ~ scramble on how to implement the new rulings. The latest agency guidelines (dated June <br />~~ ~ :~_ 5, 2007) are very complex. The typical 60 to 120 day permit process has now slowed to a <br />~;~~. +~""; ~ ~ ~n - crawl. What the guidelines do is take a one-step process consisting of applying for the <br />' permit and turn it into a two-step process consisting of (1) applying for a review of your <br />Heavy equipment working on the road. project to see if it falls under their jurisdiction and then (2) applying for the permit." He also <br />said, "With construction inflation typically running between 4 percent and 7 percent, this represents an annual <br />cost of between $1 and $2 million in delays for St. Louis County." <br />County staff reports of what it actually took ranged from a few weeks to a couple of months. Besides the <br />increased costs due to inflation over that period of time, there was also the cost of increased staff time dealing <br />with the Army Corps on the 36 determinations. <br />While no one was at risk of bodily harm because of the delay, the post-Rapanos confusion <br />'° , did increase uncertainty and county costs. The reconstruction of this county road <br />connecting to Highway 47 is now completed. <br />~== -~-= - - - More recently, the Army Corps has revised its policy to allow prospective permittees to <br />r' - ~.;.~ waive a formal jurisdictional determination and to stipulate to Clean Water Act jurisdiction <br />~` ' ~ a"~ ~ over the wetlands in order to proceed with the normal permitting process. St. Louis County <br />M:--<-~ typically waives the formal jurisdictional determination, which, in turn, has reduced the <br />~~ --~-...w. <br />~w~ ~ ;: time necessary to receive the Clean Water Act permit. <br />Almosf finished. <br />"In northeastern Minnesota we are blessed by abundant clean water. We have Lake Superior, over `~` <br />a thousand lakes and hundreds of rivers and streams, so we have a responsibility to care for this - ~ <br />great treasure," said St. Louis County Commissioner Steve O'Neil. ~ a~', <br />DANE COUNTY, WI: ~ <br />Steve O'Neil <br />Water Pollution Brings Illness and Death <br />}ti, , , You know you have a problem when your dog can drink from the toilet and live, and drink out of your <br />$~~. ~ -.~ lake and die. <br />"r Dane County's drinking water, beaches and lakes are what make it special, but a recent report by the <br />Public Health department shows citizens can be at risk. A woman swimming in Lake Mendota next to <br />the University of Wisconsin's Memorial Union-one of their most beloved landmarks-was sickened in <br />2008 by blue-green algae; dogs have died after drinking from the lakes. In 2002, Dane Rogers died <br />from blue-green algae poisoning after swimming in a local pond. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel <br />reported that, "After a yearlong investigation, the Dane County coroner ...concluded that the <br />A counrysupervisor's dog mysterious death of a Cottage Grove teenager last summer likely was the first in the nation caused by <br />making the point exposure to a toxin released by algae. <br />9 Clean Water For All: County Leaders Speak Out for Clean Water <br />A portion of [he county road needing <br />reconstruction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.