Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
r <br /> a <br /> Draft <br /> Work Group has made no recommendation on these matters yet; they are pending as part <br /> of the plan development. <br /> The table below summarizes the status of various solid waste management issues described <br /> above and issues that remain pending and suggests areas where the Work Group will face <br /> recommendation to make the draft plan complete. <br /> Table l. Solid Waste Issues for Recommendations b Work Grou recent and near-term) <br /> Item Status and Action b Work Grou Comments <br /> Recyclables Processing,current action Work Group recommendation Detailed implementation plan due <br /> completed from 11/07 received by BOCC to from staff to BOCC for 08-09 <br /> transfer commingled recyclables budget consideration <br /> from existing facility with <br /> necess modifications. <br /> Rural Residential Waste Franchising Report received from Olver in May High level of interaction with <br /> 2007.No action taken,Needs function of Solid Waste <br /> Action Pending further discussion arid Convenience Centers.Decisions <br /> recommendation from Work must be made together <br /> Grou <br /> Expansion of Rural Recycling to all SWAB determined this to be Works in concert with rural <br /> households near term priority waste franchising <br /> recommendation <br /> Drop off recycling and Convenience Report received from RRSI May High level of interaction with <br /> Centers 2007.No action taken.Needs function of Solid Waste <br /> Action Pending further discussion and Convenience Centers.Decisions on <br /> recommendation franchise and SWCC operations <br /> must be made to ether. <br /> CommerciaUnon-residential waste Report from RRSI outlining At this time, no further direct <br /> collection options March 2008.Work Group Work Group or survey takers <br /> recommends retaining current on non-residential waste <br /> Current Work collection practices following collection recommend work, <br /> overall sentiment from as there appears to be <br /> survey responses eHe-er�e�e satisfaction with the current <br /> s stem. <br /> Commercial/non-residential recycling Next step is development of Large-scale commitment to <br /> collection detailed options with costs program expansion, significant <br /> Current Work and implementation concepts financial implications.Major Work <br /> Group focus <br /> Commercial Waste Collection Franchising Report from Olver evaluates May provide less costly service <br /> franchise compared to current with lower environmental impact. <br /> system. No real financial Significant cooperation& <br /> Current Work savings shown coordination among jurisdictions. <br /> Recommendation from Could involve any combination of <br /> +�eeded-�Work Group is to jurisdictions and/or IJNC.Study <br /> continue current collections identified no major cost <br /> ��gl�a�r: savings. Some of the other <br /> benefits could be achieved <br /> throu h licensin a reements. <br /> The issues presented in the table below are integral to a comprehensive long-term solid waste <br /> plan. They are issues on which the Work Group will need to make recommendations at some <br /> future point. They are presented here to provide a perspective on future solid waste work. We <br /> 96 <br />