Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2010 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 09-16-2010 - AOG
>
Agenda - 09-16-2010 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2015 3:24:44 PM
Creation date
9/10/2010 4:38:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2010
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-16-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft <br /> because in the short run at least there is no public facility to which to direct the waste <br /> that would help pay for the facility.Franchises can provide significant benefits to the <br /> environment through more adherence to local environmental ordinances, efficient routing <br /> and increased collection density,enable greater access to service and are likely to reduce <br /> operations pressure on the convenience centers which will increase when the landfill <br /> closes. Due to the currently reduced hours and services,those pressures are already <br /> showing signs of increasing. <br /> � Financin ,g desi�and operation of the convenience centers: This may be the single most <br /> pressing element of the plan to undertake in the next twelve months and it affects all of <br /> the County as all taxpayers support the convenience centers. They are used broadly by <br /> urban as well as rural residents,and there is a strain on the general fund as the primary <br /> means of funding. When the landfill closes there will be increased pressure on them and <br /> the greater hauling MSW distance will result in increased costs. <br /> As part of shifting the Convenience Centers to the Enterprise Fund,even if some 3-R fee <br /> revenues are shifted to cover some convenience center operating and hauling costs,the <br /> long-term upgrades to design and location will have to be funded by new capital that is <br /> not now available.Four key issues are under discussion for the convenience centers-- <br /> location, design, fmancing and operation.Previous options have been presented of <br /> locations using the current five locations or adding a sixth in northeast part of the County <br /> if there is a conversion to a districtJneighborhood approach. <br /> Design of the centers needs to be upgraded for them to function safely and efficiently. <br /> Continued traffic increases and shorter hours of operation and fewer staff inean more <br /> conflict between site users and between hauling vehicles and site users. Upcoming longer <br /> hauling distances to remote transfer stations once the landfill closes will require more use <br /> of compactors for efficient hauling. <br /> Changes in design and location are intimately connected to operations issues —should all <br /> centers have identical hours, should centers be open on a rotating basis, should some <br /> centers have more services than others and function as district centers while others are <br /> smaller neighborhood centers? Finally the issue of how to fund the needed designs and <br /> changes is critical because the current funding levels do not allow any expansion of <br /> services or locations or improved operations while increased traffic demands that these <br /> changes be made sooner rather than deferred. In the past fiscal year several services were <br /> eliminated and operating hours reduced over 30%due to current budget problems. <br /> Additional operating costs result from increased site maintenance,wear and tear on <br /> overused small open top dumpsters that fill with water and gravel surfaces that must be <br /> continually regarded and pot holes refilled. <br /> The Work Group has reviewed three potential scenarios for future Solid Waste <br /> Convenience Center design and location. The three scenarios include: <br /> l.A districdneighborhood arrangement with two larger district centers that have a full <br /> suite of services and four neighborhood centers that have fewer services but are more <br /> convenient to the most rural areas. <br /> 2.A second scenario fully modernizes four of the five existing centers and maintains <br /> essentially the current level of services at all sites with little room for expansion. <br /> 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.