Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2010 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 09-16-2010 - AOG
>
Agenda - 09-16-2010 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2015 3:24:44 PM
Creation date
9/10/2010 4:38:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2010
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-16-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft <br /> Financin� <br /> The solid waste enterprise fund has functioned in a hybrid manner since taking over the <br /> Sanitation Division from Public Works in July 2007.The system has functioned as an enterprise <br /> fund for recycling and landfill services but used general fund monies to operate the Sanitation <br /> Division. The general fund pays for waste collection from convenience centers, County <br /> government buildings and the Orange County Schools,but the funds to pay for MSW collection <br /> from the schools axe now fully recovered through a fee-for-service arrangement. The Board of <br /> Commissioners has agreed to fully incorporate the Sanitation Division into the enterprise fund <br /> beginning July 1,2010,with the general fund being billed on a monthly basis for SWCC <br /> operations. Three-R(3-R)Fee revenues will begin to finance some recyclable material hauling <br /> costs previously funded by the general fund for materials such as clean wood, scrap tires, scrap <br /> metal,yard waste,and white goods beginning in 2010-1 l. The financial integration of the <br /> Sanitation Division into the enterprise fund will continue to be refine d and adjusted as <br /> necessary. <br /> Tables in Chapter 1 detail the funding,revenue and expenses for the Solid Waste Management <br /> Department in 2008-09. <br /> Recycling Program Financing <br /> Three-R fees wholly fund county recycling and waste reduction services and a portion of <br /> Environmental Support Division expenses. There are currently no recycling program expansions <br /> planned so 3-R Fee rates are likely to remain constant unless the shift of Sanitation Division <br /> recycling-related service costs exceed current fee levels. The major change since the previous <br /> plan submittal has been an increase in the various 3-R fees to provide for full recycling program <br /> funding, including indirect costs, or to cover operating costs related to expanded programs. This <br /> increase resulted in elimination in FY2009-10 of any recycling program reliance on landfill fees. <br /> We believe natural growth in existing programs will now be fully covered by the 3-R Fee <br /> charged to new units added to the various programs. E.g.the cost of serving a new single family <br /> urban house with curbside recycling is $52 per year and that is the fee they will be charged for <br /> that service plus the$37 basic fee that covers their portion of drop-off recycling, education, <br /> hazardous waste, etc. <br /> The exception is that there are two smaller commercial programs where the low level of 3-R fee <br /> ($37/unitlyear)does not reflect true program costs,but the tonnage diversion and longstanding <br /> nature of the programs along with the strong relationships between the County and participating <br /> businesses, have accounted for the continuation of those programs under the broader financing <br /> umbrella. This arrangement is likely to continue until a broader commercial program is <br /> established with a more comprehensive and targeted fee structure that enables significant <br /> expansion beyond the 250 or so businesses now served. That could be part of future long term <br /> planning considerations. <br /> 36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.