Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2010 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 09-16-2010 - AOG
>
Agenda - 09-16-2010 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2015 3:24:44 PM
Creation date
9/10/2010 4:38:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2010
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-16-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft <br /> • Commercial recyclin�this element of the waste stream retains the largest potential for <br /> waste reduction,without a more systematic approach to reducing commercial waste we <br /> are unlikely to reach our waste reduction goal.By increasing collection efficiency in the <br /> past two years,the County has managed to provide over 250 businesses with recycling <br /> services but has reached its limit under currently configured staffing and fmancing, <br /> • C&D mana ement: While C&D volume is declining,the C&D landfill,related recycling <br /> processing for regulated materials and enforcement of rules pertaining to managing these <br /> materials remain important counTy resources. If the reduction goal is maintained and local <br /> disposal of C&D is an important characteristic of our solid waste system, means of <br /> sustaining these programs must be determined. The County will be capable of managing <br /> the recycling and disposal any abandoned manufactured housing delivered to the landfill. <br /> • Landfill closure and long-term maintenance:While this inevitable,the County must <br /> ensure means of managing the closed landfill for at least for thirty years according to <br /> Federal law. If any environmental problems arise,the County must provide solutions. <br /> • Conversion to sin�le-stream recvclin�: Long-term this does appear to be the direction that <br /> most curbside programs are headed as they have been in other counties and typically it <br /> includes conversion from bins to rollcarts along with automated collection. The Work <br /> Group and various elected officials have expressed interest in this technique as well. <br /> Currently there is not sufficient staff capacity to effectively plan and implement this <br /> conversion even if it is adopted or recommended. <br /> • Expansion of rural residential curbside rec �clin�there are two distinct phases to be <br /> considered phase one being the near-term addition of about 1,000 homes that could be <br /> added with no new staffing(provided existing staffing is restored)and a second tier that <br /> expands to a near universal service encompassing as much as 90%of the rural areas, <br /> excluding the most sparsely settled and hardest to serve areas. <br /> • Franchised waste collections: if there is not to be a County operated solid waste facility, <br /> then the direct benefit to the County of franchised collections is somewhat limited. <br /> Franchises can provide significant benefits to the environment, greater enforcement of <br /> local environmental rules, enable greater access to service, can stabilize and minimize <br /> collection costs and are likely to reduce operations pressure on the convenience centers <br /> which will increase when the landfill closes. <br /> • Re�ulatorv and economic incentives to promote waste reduction:As corollaries to <br /> implementing recycling collection programs,regulations and incentives can maximize <br /> program results. Orange County began residential curbside cardboard collection in <br /> November 2008 and banned it from the garbage in March 2009. Similar bans could be <br /> implemented along with economic incentives such as Pay As You Throw waste <br /> collection.There has been little short-term political interest in Pay-As-You-Throw over <br /> the past year. <br /> • Review of other alternative technolo�ies and consideration of re io�al a�proaches: The <br /> SWAB has been tasked by the BOCC with conducting a review these two items due in <br /> 2010-11. Ultimately,use of large-scale alternative technologies may require regional <br /> approaches to achieve sufficient economies of scale. <br /> • Develo�ment of infrastructure to collect and manage source separated organic wastes: <br /> This has been discussed in only very broad and abstract terms. It is very much a future <br /> oriented issue, although privately contracted infrastructure exists now and is cost- <br /> effective where wastes and their collection routes are concentrated. <br /> 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.