Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
75 <br />6.25.7 to existing dwellings and uses. The current standards would .. ! <br />prevent land owners with failing septic systems and no suitable repair <br />area on the same lot from locating nitrification fields on a separate <br />lot. Definitions are also provided of "septic tank system," <br />"alternative septic system," and "community alternative system." The <br />latter definition was inadvertently omitted when revisions to the <br />interim development standards for University Lake watershed were <br />adopted. <br />QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND PLANNING BOARD <br />Commissioner Hartwell indicated that he believes this was meant to <br />address the repair of existing systems. However, it is not stated that <br />way in 6.25.7. In response to this comment, Collins stated that a new <br />system will eventually be considered an existing system. That system <br />could then end up with a failing septic system and would need the <br />latitude provided by this amendment. <br />A motion was made by commissioner Willhoit, seconded by commissioner <br />Marshall, to refer the proposed amendments to the Planning Board for a <br />recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner <br />than August 6, 1990. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />G. ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS <br />2. DEFINITIONS <br />a. Article 22 Efficiency Apartment <br />This presentation was made by Mary Scearbo. In summary this <br />item was presented to receive public comment on a proposed amendment to <br />the definition of "efficiency apartment" to allow flexibility as to the <br />location of such units. <br />NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, PLANNING BOARD <br />OR CITIZENS <br />A motion was made Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner <br />Marshall, to refer the proposed amendment to the Planning Board for a <br />recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner <br />than August 6, 1990. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />H. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS TEXT AMENDMENTS <br />1. Definitions <br />a. Section II Subdivision <br />b. Section II Minor Subdivision <br />These presentations were made by Mary Scearbo. In summary these <br />items were presented to receive public comment on a-proposed amendment <br />to the Subdivision Regulations to allow the combination or recombination. <br />of non-conforming lots. Item H-1-b proposes an amendment to the <br />definition of minor subdivision in Section II of the Subdivision <br />Regulations.