Orange County NC Website
-A <br />.f <br />7 <br />primarily in Durham County with only 1 1/2 acres in Orange County. This 1 1/2 acres is <br />in the Rural Buffer and it has been argued that it is more appropriately a Transitional <br />Area. Chapel Hill regilested that Orange County roal.e that change ar-d all three Boards " ...-.~-.~ <br />voted to so do. At the present time it is in Lhe Transition Area. He stated that a tWO"._ <br />part proposal was expected. First, the Land Use Plan would be changed. Second, a <br />rezoning request would be brought before the Chapel Hill Board since it is in Chapel <br />Hill's Transition Area. Chapel Hill would then bring it to the Joint Planning Area " <br />Public Hearing. The next step in this process will be for each Aoard to consider this" <br />request. The request submitted is far this property to be rezoned R1-A zoning district <br />which requires a minimum lot size of 25,000 square feet. This is consistent with tl,e <br />Joint Area Land Use Plan and will do na damage to tl~e concept of the Rural. Buffer. Tl~e <br />Planning Staff and Planning Board recommends approval of this request. <br />THE HEARING WAS OPEN FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS. <br />hf~or Eleanor l;innaird asked if this property was zoned Rural Buffer at the time <br />that it was purchased. Commissioner Marshall indicated that it was, however, Ms. Zinn, <br />President of Cazwell Development, was not aware that this portion of the property was <br />].orated in Orange County. <br />-~_ ~. <br />Kinnaird asked i:f there were other similar parcels in the Rural Buffer. r <br />Walden stated that this is a very unique situation. His staff has .researched the <br />Rural Buffer area and they did not find otlrcr parcels encroaching into t}ae Rural Huffer. <br />A motion was made by Commissiarrer Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to <br />refer this matter to the Chapel Hill Town Council for a decision, and to the Orange <br />County Planning Board for a recommendation, to come back to the Board na sooner than <br />November 6th. <br />VDTE: UNANIMOUS <br />2. JDINT PLANNING AGREEMENT <br />a. Article 4 - Water & Sewer Extensions <br />The presentation was made by Orange County Planning Director Marvin <br />Collins for the purpose of receiving citizen comment on a proposed amendment to the <br />Orange County-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Joint Planning Agreement. The proposed amendment to <br />the Agreement was precipitated by the plans of the Orange County Board of Education to <br />construct an eleIDentary school at the northeast corner of New Hope Church Road and ?. C. <br />Highway 86. The Mite of the scl-ool will not be in the Rural Buffer. However, the <br />school will best be served by public water and sewer, and parts of the lines will need <br />to be extended through the Rural Buffer. Plans are to extend a l2-inch water line from <br />the Hillsborough system, and a three-inch force main for sewer. Both.lines would be <br />extended south along N.C. Highway 86. All parties to the Joint Planning Agreement have <br />been operating with the understanding that public water and sewer extensions could not <br />be made into the Rural Buffer. In response to questions regarding the extension of <br />utilities to the proposed school, the County Attorney concluded that there are no <br />prohibitions against such extensions in either the Joint Planning Agreement or the Joint <br />Planning Area Land Use flan. On July 2$, 1989, the Managers and Planning Directors for <br />Orange County, Chapel Hill, and Carrboro met to discuss the situation. It was concluded <br />that an amendment to the Joint Planning Agreement was needed to clarify the intentions <br />of tlxe three jurisdictions in regard to public water and sewer extensions into the Rural <br />Buffer. The proposed amendment would add a new Article, specifically Article ~} -Water <br />and Sewer Extensions. Under the provisions of the new Article, the extension of public <br />water and sewer lines through the Rural Buffer portion of the Joint Planning Area would <br />be permitted, provided the extensions were necessary to serve an essential public <br />facility, such as a school, ar to remedy a public health emergency not otherwise <br />