Minutes - 19890905 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~s ..~ ~ : ~. consultants. He feels that ~WASA should treat the water to North 3ards for the Clean Water Act and put the added cost to the consumer and people in the watershed pay for OWASA probleius-._i He talked about the pollutants travel. He asked the people in opposition to this proposal to they did. ICHOLS who owns land in the Upper Eno watershed spoke in opposition to nterim development standards in the watershed. He described the e uses and stated that they do not affect the quality of his drinking against being asked to abide by a two acre minimum lot size to help f the cost of protecting the water in this area. He feels that .the main e runoff water. He talked about impervious surface and stated that he t of subdivisions do not need paved roads. He talked about the use value property and the money he borrows using that value as collateral. DURHAM, owner of land on Dairyland Raad, spoke about his cluster nd the length of time it took to get it approved. He asked where he dilemma. SHEPARD, architect of the W. T. Durham Subdivision, asked if this project ect to these new interim regulations. He expressed three concerns: (1) as a ten acre tract that is divided by an existing roadway with eight side and two on the other, will the Planning Staff require a landhook to wa tracts, (2) he hopes they retain the same cluster concept that is now (3) the County has moved away from allowing private roads. He hopes the llow more private roads for the developments in the watershed that e acre tract. FOUSHEE spoke out of concern for those who own a small amount of land little money. She stated that she opposes the minimum lot size She spoke on behalf of the community members who are in the lower groups who have dreams for themselves and their children. .E5 BURNS of Damascus Church Road spoke in opposition to the proposal racy interim regulatory standards have a way of quietly becoming ndards. This proposal to pxotect the water quality places unfair burdens landowner by shifting the cost of water quality to the rural landowner s to the consumption of the finished product for compensation. P POI'THR'ESS,.°a resident of the University Lake Watershed area, voiced a the, S 'atr.e :lot minimum. He felt it-would be prohibitive for people just ifi life and attempting to raise their families. He expressed a concern 'operty owners will be discouraged from trying to buy land in this area. HOLLINS, a property owner in the Upper Eno Watershed, stated that for property owners is one of the sensible things he heard during this He stated that every lot in this county drains into someone else's water Mess of where it is. HACKNEX stated that he feels the regulations are too strict and the use seems to be to regulate growth as opposed to protecting the water ~ryone is in favor of protecting the water, however, the residents of :an afford to pay for the treatment of their water.