Browse
Search
ORD-2010-046 Zoning Atlas Amendment Rezoning - 3300 NC 54 West
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2010-2019
>
2010
>
ORD-2010-046 Zoning Atlas Amendment Rezoning - 3300 NC 54 West
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2019 3:13:33 PM
Creation date
8/26/2010 10:42:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/21/2010
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C.1
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-24-2010
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
Minutes 05-24-2010
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff Recommendations: <br />•Receive the rezoning petition, <br />•Conduct the Public Hearing and accept comments from all interested parties, <br />•Refer the matter to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the County <br />Board of Commissioners no later than August 17, 2010 <br />•Adjourn the Public Hearing until August 17, 2010 in order to receive the Planning Board's <br />recommendation. <br />Planning Board member Tommy McNeil arrived at 7:25 PM. <br />Public Comment <br />Perdita Holtz was speaking as a citizen. She said that she lives in the White Cross node <br />and she is concerned about what Mr. Davis will do with the property. She does support non- <br />residential development in this node, provided the uses serve predominantly the surrounding <br />area. She said that the zoning ordinance states that LC-1 and NC-2 zoning districts are for <br />limited commercial uses designed to serve the population at the neighborhood and rural level <br />with convenience goods and personal services. It also states that the NC-2 zoning district <br />would serve a market area population confined to the immediate area and would generally not <br />serve commuters or persons outside the existing neighborhood. She said that recently a U- <br />Haul operation was started on the Shell station property across NC 54. She said that U-Haul <br />vans and trailers are being stored on the south side of NC 54 on the property zoned R-1 and is <br />under consideration for the rezoning. She questions whether a U-Haul operation fits the state of <br />intent of the LC-1 and NC-2 zoning districts. She said that she removed herself from the <br />discussions in the Planning Department because she has a personal interest in this matter. <br />Regarding her view as a citizen and an owner of fairly adjacent property, she said that sales and <br />rentals of durable and convenience goods are permitted in those two zoning districts, however, <br />sales and rentals of new and used motor vehicles are allowed only in GC-4 and the industrial <br />districts. She said that if it is determined that a U-Haul rental operation is a permitted use in an <br />NC-2 zoning district, she would like some sort of vegetative screen to be required to mitigate the <br />impact of that outdoor storage component of the business. <br />Teresa Smith is the owner of the retail business on land owned by Mr. Davis and the <br />building that is designated as NC-2. She said that the U-Hauls were brought up as a concern <br />and she believes that Mr. Davis has addressed this by moving them off the property. Right now, <br />her understanding is that they really are just looking at the opportunity for the septic. She said <br />that they are trying to build a community activity center there and this requires adequate septic. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked whether the Board was considering uses when it considers <br />rezoning and Michael Harvey said no. Any use within the NC-2 zoning designation can be <br />developed on any parts of the property being rezoned. <br />Commissioner Yuhasz asked how much of this property would be required for a septic <br />system and if this land (for septic system) is dedicated to the non-residential use, would there <br />be any land left over or any possibility of using this for residential purposes. <br />Michael Harvey said that there are existing septic lines and a repair area. He said that <br />staff will be working with Mr. Davis on many different issues and septic will be one of them. <br />Mark Marcoplos said that it would make sense for the Planning Board to just say at this <br />meeting that everything is ok with this rezoning instead of bringing it back at another meeting. <br />He said that this would save time. <br />Commissioner Gordon explained the reasoning behind the process. The reason for <br />scheduling the public hearing at one meeting and the decision by the Commissioners at a <br />subsequent meeting is so that there will be adequate time for the public to receive notice of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.