Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
~.w -'~ <br />_~ v ~i <br />(2) Section 3.0-3.5, Land Use Plan. ~-~ <br />UES4~ FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND THE PLANNING BOARD i <br />GOMMISSIONER WILLHOIT requested that the cover on the document be changed. <br />MR. EDDLEMAN asked what the time span for updating a Land Use Plan should be in <br />order for the plan to be valuable. <br />MR. STANCIL stated that many COt~'meframe has been chosen.upTheemosorcommonly useds <br />growing so rapidly that a five yeax <br />up-date is five years. <br />THERE WERE NO CITIZEN GOMMENTS. <br />A motion was made by ChairmaB ardeforsacrecamuc-endationstoacomeMbackato~theaBoardsno <br />item be referred to the Planning <br />earlier than August 1, 1989• <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />e. LUp_g_gg Land Use Elegy M~ (Pr°tected Watershed Overlay) <br />The presentation was made by Mary Scearbo. In summary this iteortioneofg <br />presented for the purpose of receiving public comment on a proposal to add a p <br />the southeast corner of the ompletenBo ndary of thetUpperlEnarWatershedaonrthedLandrUse <br />District and delineate the c p <br />Element. ''~ <br />THERE WERE NO QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OR PLANNING BOARD. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR CITIZEN COMMENT. <br />ALLEN SPALT stated that he recently discovered that there seems to be a problem in <br />the characterization of impervious surface in Orange County. He commented that having <br />such surfaces include concrete or asphalt does not go far enough. There are other <br />impervious surfaces, such as unpaved, or gravel surfaces. He suggested that gravel <br />areas for commercial use with 30$ of the area being graveled that it include a <br />significant amount of impervious surface. This needs to includes gravel surfaces as <br />well. <br />MS. SCEARBO stated that that could not be addressed at this time since the <br />advertisement did not include gravel surfaces. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Motion was made by Ghairman Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to refer this <br />item to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board no sooner <br />than August 1st. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />3.a. Z- 5-89 PW-II PROTECTED WATERSHED OVERLAY <br />The presentation was made by Mary Scearbo. In summary this item is being <br />heard for the purposth~fUreeTi~nogWatershed toetheopWllpProtected WatershedrOverlay t <br />southeast corner of pp <br />