Browse
Search
Minutes - 19890515
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Minutes - 19890515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 11:39:13 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:00:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/15/1989
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I/ <br />Those communities were Durham, Chapel Hill and Hillsborough. Using this method they <br />arrived at an average travel time to each of the six facilities. He indicated that <br />they do have all of the exact times to each site from each community and he would be <br />happy to go over this information. <br />MR. CHRIS BEST asked how this matrix is different from the one presented at <br />public hearing? <br />MR. MCDOWELL stated that it is primarily different in that it is broken into two <br />different categories. One of those categories is Community Concerns and the other is <br />Engineering and Cost Concerns. We gave those equal rating and grouped them by <br />putting all like items together. He also indicated that the areas of Land Use and <br />Access were most heavily weighted. <br />CHAIRMAN CAREY asked to have the significance of the grand total figures and <br />relate those to cost and to the concerns the Commissioners voiced in the last <br />meeting, which resulted in including social, environmental and land use among the <br />criteria. <br />MR. MCDOWELL replied that those concerns were the reason they broke the matrix <br />apart. He indicated that they tried to develop two main criteria for review. One is <br />the environmental/community concerns and the other is the developmental, or <br />engineering and numbers, concerns. With regards to community concerns, the highest <br />total score is site 11. Under social and environmental concerns site 17 scored <br />relatively high. However, when you look at the breakdown it might not be a good <br />site. He stated that Site 11 was the best site foX community concerns. The best <br />Site from a development view was Site 9. However, he indicated that the cost <br />difference was not one of the most significant issues because it was only a 10~ <br />difference. He stated that you have to look at the overview of all categories to <br />pick the best site. <br />DAN EDDLEMAN asked when development concerns vs, community concerns would be <br />balanced. He stated that he could see that development concerns are off-setting land <br />use compatibility. He did not agree that they should have equal rating. He stated <br />that if the County decides to have an airport, they would want it to be in an area <br />compatible with Commercial/Industrial growth. The infrastructure impact would be <br />more compatible with a commercial-industrial use than with an agricultural or <br />rural/residential use. <br />CHAIRMAN CAREY stated that that concern was one of the reasons the Commissioners <br />ask that the category of land use and applicability to current and future land use <br />be included. The criteria as it has been applied gets at that. He asked the <br />consultants to explain haw it was applied. <br />MR. MCDOWELL indicated that they had three categories surrounding land use. He <br />stated that if the focus is on future land use that was planned to be <br />rural/residential it was simply non compatible. If it is agricultural/residential it <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.