Browse
Search
Minutes - 19890406
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Minutes - 19890406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2013 11:42:31 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:00:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/6/1989
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
these people who have been impacted and have borne the brunt of this can be compensated <br />fairly for their land. He thinks that's very important and would support that in anyway ,,,,,~w <br />he could. He asked that the County look into that suggestion and work with the land <br />conservancy or whoever so that everyone will benefit. He expressed thanks to the many <br />people for a tremendous job of two or three years of effort in putting together the buffer-` <br />zone plan and expressed hope that the people that put this together can keep it together. <br />CHET CAVALLITO, spoke on behalf of himself and a few neighbors in the area just to <br />the east of Old 86 and west of the area. This proposal is not just changing a node. <br />There's a whole gerrymandering stretch there, which without much extension will extend <br />from the northern edge of Ghapel Hill to almost the southern edge of Hillsborough, There <br />are a total of three so-called nodes or intersections in that area. In regard to the <br />changes proposed who knows what might be necessary 10 years from now or even less. As of <br />now, nothing needs to be changed other than possibly making some adjustment to those <br />people directly impacted by this proposed change. The joint planning groups that were <br />involved in creating this plan certainly are to be commended and supported to the extent <br />that is feasible and reasonably possible. He appreciated hearing from the gentlemen <br />representing Teer that they have an investment here. Considering it was purchased in <br />1984, perhaps that should be categorized as a speculation rather than as an investment <br />since the direction of this was quite evident. Gertainly living in proximity to the <br />highway is noisy. The other thing is trading highway noise for blasting noise. Highway <br />noise, for the most part, travels through the air, blasting noise travels through the air, <br />and through the rocks. <br />Mr. Phears emphasized that the property in question is property situated on the <br />interstate right-af-way. It runs roughly a mile, 4 to 5 thousand feet, a little short of <br />a mile, down the interstate. He stated that the noise level on the property doesn't meet'^,~~, <br />Orange County's own noise standards for residential property much less the noise standardw.. <br />propagated elsewhere. He made reference to the acreage size and stated that a tremendous;,;,;; <br />amount of this property is committed to the land application sewage system which is a ~"~~ <br />spray system they use on golf courses. Roughly 100 acres would be used for this system. <br />Two Hundred Four acres are in the agricultural residential zoning for the rock quarry. A <br />major portion o£ that actually remains undeveloped and remains forested in terms of land <br />conservation. In terms of land conservation, Nello Teer is actually much better at <br />leaving some open spaces in those areas. In Durham, Nello Teer has roughly 500 acres, 100 <br />acres of which are being used. The balance of it is in buffers and woodlands. The <br />Blackwood property was purchased to be used as buffer and woodland. He clarified that the <br />staff report treats these as one big application but they view them as an AR application. <br />He asked that the record show that they have separate applications. There is a statement <br />in the staff report that this property could be rezoned to AR, without having a land <br />exchange. Ha asked Mr. Collins if that was correct at the present time? <br />Mr. Collins stated that there is within the land use plan, what is called a land use <br />plan zoning district matrix. The question that Mr. Phears asked is whether or not the <br />property could be rezoned to AR at this time. Based on that matrix, there are two zoning <br />districts which are lined with the rural buffer classification. That is AR far <br />Agricultural Residential and R1, so rezoning is possible at this time. He pointed out <br />that a public hearing was held back in February of this year for the very purpose of <br />changing that matrix, so that the only zoning district that would be permitted within the <br />rural buffer for Land Use Plan designation would be the rural buffer zoning district. The <br />Board of Commissioners, will in all probability, consider the change in that matrix at <br />their first meeting in May. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.