Browse
Search
Minutes - 19890406
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Minutes - 19890406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2013 11:42:31 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:00:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/6/1989
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ -. <br />PAGE 3 <br />unknown to Nello Teer, a moratorium on mining permits was passed in February of 1985. <br />Nello Teer was unaware of the moratorium and were continuing to develop their mining °~`~'?. <br />permit. During February and March, Nello Teer spoke with the Orange County Planning ;; <br />Department about developing its mining permit. In March of 1985, Nello Teer set up an <br />appointment with the Planning Department to go over their Special Use application and were <br />given an appointment for April 2. At the meeting of the Board of Commissioners an April <br />1, mining as a permitted use in the Zoning Ordinance was deleted from same districts and <br />permitted as a special use in AR, Il, I2, and I3 districts. At the meeting with Nello <br />Teer on April 2 they was advised that the .joint Planning process was underway and that the <br />site had been designated as a Rural Industrial activity note. A Comprehensive .Plan was <br />produced that showed this area as a Rural Industrial activity node. Because of apposition <br />it was deleted from the plan and the property became classified not Rural Industrial <br />activity node but rural buffer. In his opinion it went fronn one of the more permissive <br />categories in the plan to the most restricted category in the .plan. What Nello Teer is <br />trying to do is to develop an innovative way to cure the problem they are faced with. The <br />plan that was adopted in 1987 does not permit a reasonable use of their property. In a <br />constitutional sense the property cannot be used for anything. While it may be nice to <br />have a buffer or greenbelt along the interstate, the problem is there are people who own <br />that greenbelt, .including his client, and who think that they ought to have some <br />reasonable use. of their property. This hearing is to talk about a Comprehensive Plan <br />change--to put a crush stone quarry an that property. That is why the request has been <br />made to rezone this property AR. The .reason this area has been chosen is that there is <br />roughly 40 million tons of aggregate reserves on that property. That is a substantial <br />amount of money. Those are valuable, natural resources--natural resources that everyone <br />uses everyday. They are like gold and diamonds to Nello Teer and they desire to mine <br />those valuable natural resources but cannot do so under the current classification. <br />Chairman Carey requested that Mr. Phears limit his discussion and comment to the <br />applicability of a land use change in that particular location. <br />MR. PHEARS continued emphasizing that he wanted to make it clear for the public <br />record why he was here. He stated there is no reasonable use for~the property from the <br />Teers standpoint. The noise readings in the RS are at levels in excess of 80 decimals. <br />The Federal Highways Administration Environmental Impacts Study for I-40 indicates that <br />the noise footprint, the 70 decimal noise footprint, is 500 feet wide on each side of the <br />right-of-way, That eliminates a substantial portion of the Teer property. The EIS tells <br />you that under federal highway guidelines that's an intolerable level of noise for <br />residential development. In addition to the noise, the property has topographic features <br />which include very wet areas, difficult soils to work with, and no water and sewer. Other <br />environmental impacts o£ I-40 deal with noise, visual impact, the general indesirability <br />of it, as well as the concern that everybody has as to what will happen in that corridor. <br />The question is who would spend, what will be 2 to 3 hundred thousand dollars to build out <br />there, because of the development cast and the type of house that has to be put with it, <br />so that they can live next to an interstate with na local services, an intolerable level <br />of noise, no water and sewer, and a drive of S miles to get a loaf of bread. Ne11o Teer <br />believes that the original classification was an error and that the policy underlying the <br />classification ought to be changed. The conditions are such in the area that the <br />Comprehensive Plan had to be changed. He also stated that he is aware that Orange County <br />fought I-40 through that corridor because it was of the belief that I-40 would have <br />adverse environmental impacts. When it became pointless to fight, the property was <br />designated Rural buffer to be the buffer far everyone else. <br />In answer to a question from an unidentified citizen Mr. Phears stated that the <br />Blackwood property was purchased for the purpose of additional buffer for this plan. The <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.