Minutes - 20091109 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

smaller number of parcels than Option 1 would impact,and something that has not been figured into the cost of this is the cost of transferring the lots from one county to the other and the discovery that would have to happen in the tax offices and changing the collection patterns there.Most importantly, Option 2v.3 would allow residents to continue to send their children to the same schools for the most part and receive services from the county they have been paying their taxes to. She opined there is no reason at all that a county line should be a straight line,and there are over 200 reasons, over 200 parcels,why the line should be adjusted to reflect current practices. People have made important life decisions based on practices of county government and they should be able to rely on their county government to make permanent and official the line which reflects past taxing and student attendance. She asked the Commissioners to vote in favor of Option 2v.3,and request that State House Representatives Alice Bordsen and Dan Ingle bring this to the next Legislative Session and pass it. PUBLIC COMMENTS—Comments from Mill Creek Subdivision were that the development owners endorse Option 2v.3. The Board of Directors of the Homeowners' Association asked the Commissioners to consider putting all of Mill Creek in Alamance County,the developed as well as the undeveloped portions. One resident stated that some residents expressed a willingness to help pay for the resurvey of the line. Another resident stated he specifically chose the section in Orange County because of excellent schools and that the motivation of others for changing the county line serves a few and would negate his decision to move into Orange County, as did others in that section. Comments from the Ninth Street area were that some residents requested that the line be changed to conform to the map that shows the line down the back of the properties and that they agree to participate in the cost of surveying and redrawing said county line with a cost not to exceed$3.20 per linear foot of their property that is on the boundary line. Another resident expressed disappointment that she was given incorrect information from a realtor when she made an offer on her property. A resident of the Village of the Oaks stated he chose Orange County because of schools and services. A resident in the Cane Creek area stated that the location of the legal line is no longer uncertain,that the original location of the line is the only legal boundary between Orange and Alamance Counties,and as such,both counties are breaking State law in the taxation of properties in the other county and in the transfer of taxes to the other county. He stated the proposed line is unfair and unjust,paying for an unnecessary additional survey is fiscally irresponsible,and that using the legal surveyed line is the best and most economically responsible solution that cannot be challenged in court. He suggested the line issue should be settled this year with the already located legal line,as it has been the failure of past county commissioners that this issue was not resolved and subsequently created more justifiably angry residents as time passed. A resident in the Mebane Oaks Road area stated that his property is isolated from the rest of Alamance County by Mrs. Morrow's farm and the Alamance County landfill,that all of his services come from Orange County, and he is used to the situation that exists and is excited about Option 2 and would like to remain where he is. COMMISSIONERS' DELIBERATION—Commissioner Yuhasz stated the Commissioners need to recognize where the historic line is but don't necessarily have to ratify that. He further stated that the Commissioners have the opportunity to decide where the line is going to be moving forward to meet the expectations of people who have bought property along the line and have expected to be and were told that they were going to be in one county or another. With information available now,with the historic line,and where the line is located going forward,the Commissioners will have a much more precise definition of where the county line is and will be in a much better position to maintain the position of the line. Option 2v.3 respects as much as possible the expectations of people, particularly those who have smaller, welldeveloped property. He stated he would lean toward encouraging the staffs to come up with a scenario that uses Option 2v.3 as its basis. He asked for more information as to how many developed properties in Mill Creek have been added to the initial Option 2.He expressed concern that if properties are moved from one jurisdiction to another,that might change the value of the property and have a negative effect on a lender's perspective and on the owner's perspective. He stated he would like to take a look at this before deciding to change properties from one jurisdiction to another. Commissioner Jacobs noted that in the Mill Creek section in Option 2v.3 there are 65 lots,about 35 developed and 30 undeveloped lots,and there are roughly three or four households that have children on the Orange County side. He stated that 95%of the land area in Mill Creek is in Alamance County. He also noted that indications from both school systems are that it is feasible to have an inter-local school agreement to allow children to attend the school of their choice.