Browse
Search
Minutes - 19890227
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Minutes - 19890227
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2013 11:26:55 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:59:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/27/1989
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Y .:,.~ <br />(3) Art, 8.8.11 '-. Kennels (Class B Special Use Permit) <br />The presentation was made by Marvin Collins. In summary this item is to <br />receive citizen comment on a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance provisions <br />relating to kennels, in order to (l) develop consistency between the Zoning Ordinance <br />and Animal Control Ordinance, and (2) to include provisions for wildlife <br />rehabilitation. The current definition of kennel provides for the lodging and <br />boarding of domestic pets. There is no reference in the ordinance pertaining to <br />breeding.of animals. The effect of the Animal Ordinance is to prohibit breeding <br />kennels in the zoned townships. The Planning Department believes that this was not <br />the intent of the ordinance. The amendment was also proposed by the Animal Protection <br />Society to allow for rehabilitation of wildlife. The Animal Protection Society has <br />submitted plans for an animal shelter which includes facilities for rehabilitation of <br />birds and other wildlife, <br />The Planing Staff is proposing to define a Class I kennel consistent with the <br />Class I Kennel Permit (Animal Control) and a Class II Kennel consistent with the Class <br />II Kennel Permit (Animal Control). Class I Kennels would be permitted by right in <br />certain residential (RB, AR, R1) and commercial (CC3, GC4, AS) zoning districts. <br />Class II Kennels would be permitted in those same zones with approval of a Class B <br />Special Use Permit. All kennels included under the current definition must be located <br />in those zones and have Class B Special Use Permit approval. <br />THERE WERE NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS OR PLANNING BOARD <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS <br />Mr. Owen Door spoke in apposition to these zoning amendments, He spoke <br />representing his father-in-law.Ted Green and wife Cindy Door who are partners in a <br />kennel. Through the new amendments, their kennel is a Class II kennel, He asked what <br />zoning district they are iri? Collins indicated that they were zoned Rural Buffer. <br />Door stated that 13 years ago they were given approval to operate the kennel. They <br />are licensed and inspected by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture and the State of North <br />Carolina. They feel they are over-regulated. He asked that their kennel, Green <br />Valley Farms Kennel be exempt from the requirement to procure a Class B Special Use <br />Permit. <br />Mr. Jacobs stated that because it would be a non-conforming project, as long as <br />the existing facilities and operations are not expanded nothing would need to be done, <br />..Door asked if it was necessary that he continue to be inspected by Orange County <br />even though he is ,USDA licensed and inspected. Chairman Carey indicated that he would <br />need to continue obtaining the licensing and being inspected as it is a requirement of <br />the Animal Control Ordinance which is separate from the County's zoning regulations. <br />Don Ingram, on behalf of the Animal Protection Society, asked that the Board <br />favorably consider the recommendations regarding amendments to the Zoning Ordinance <br />with regard to expanding the kennel operations definition to include wildlife <br />rehabilitation. <br />Ted Latta indicated that Alma Johnson asked him to make several remarks for her. <br />He commented on Class I - 8.8.11.2 (a) referring to the site size to protect adjacent <br />properties. Latta stated that Ms, Johnson believes that a noise limit needs to be <br />included in this section to protect adjacent property owners from barking dogs. Also, <br />on Class II - 8.8.11,3(x) referring to building plans being reviewed by the Animal <br />~. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.