Browse
Search
Minutes - 19890227
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1989
>
Minutes - 19890227
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2013 11:26:55 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:59:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/27/1989
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />_. ~ .._'~ <br />occur at any point. It could change from a research oriented goal to one that is mix <br />and could go either way to one that is residential. <br />Yuhasz asked what effect, from a property tax aspect, would the PTD designation <br />have. If it was currently being taxed and then was designated PID what would be the <br />effect. Collins indicated that he did not know of any lands currently in the PID <br />designation, or to be considered for the future, that were taxed at this point. <br />The question was asked by an unidentified citizen regarding who requested a <br />Buffer .. <br />Collins stated that the idea for the 100 foot Buffer stems from the joint <br />planning efforts with Chapel Hill and Carrboro. There is a portion of Duke Forest <br />north of Carrboro known as the Blackwood Division. In the Joint Planning Area Land <br />Use Plan there is a substantial transition of urban growth designated north of <br />Carrboro. There was a concern having that transition area abut Duke Forest; what was <br />decided was to have a 400 foot set distance between Duke Forest and the transition <br />area border which would be apart of the Rural Buffer. Within that 400 foot strip <br />there would be a 100 foot setback buffer for any development that occurred within that <br />area. 'That was set in place as a part of the joint planning efforts with Chapel Hill <br />and Carrboro. That situation is different than in other portions of the County where <br />the lot size requirements are not as large. In ,the Rural Buffer there is a two acre <br />minimum and in the majority of the remaining part of the County there is a minimum of <br />one acre ax less. The recommendation tonight is to take the same standard, the 100 <br />foot buffer, and carry it forward, instead of trying to surround all of these proposed <br />PID districts with a lower density residential development. This provides a measure <br />of protection, primarily to Duke Forest, but. does allow someone to develop their <br />'~ adjoining property. Hillsborough submitted a letter today requesting that their small <br />piece of Lake Michael not be included in a PID designation. The reason for that is <br />that a yeaz or more ago they requested that an adjustment be made in their zoning <br />boundary. In one instance the County gave up some territory and in another <br />Hillsborough gave up some. This small piece of Lake Michael should have been included <br />within their zoning jurisdiction. They have requested that the County consider at a <br />later date releasing that area into their zoning jurisdiction. <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Ervin W. Allen had no comment after hearing that Lake Michael would not be <br />involved in this action. <br />Tom DeLoache spoke in opposition to the 100 foot buffer. He indicated that the <br />county should pay for this land if they want to make it useless. He intended to <br />develop this land but current regulations are making that all but impossible. <br />Rufus Boswell, Durham resident, spoke an behalf of his mother, opposing the 100 <br />foot buffer. She has 1100 feet of her property contiguous to the park. He considers <br />this a "taking" because of the limits on what is allowed on the buffer portion of the <br />property. Cutting of trees in the buffer is prohibited. He emphasized that the <br />County should pay for this land if they want to use it. <br />David Lakin, of Save Duke Forest, spoke in favor of the PID zoning for Duke <br />Forest. He suggested asking Duke what th~±y are doing an the land and use that <br />information to amend the Permitted Use Table--accommodate their needs and stop there. <br />He sees no need for two types of PxD zoning. He asked that the Board stay with the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.