Orange County NC Website
4 Putting Smart Growth to Work in Rural Communities <br />Loss of forest land <br />Conversion of forest land in rural communities is also <br />changing the character of those communities. The <br />U.S. Forest Service estimates that between 1982 and <br />1997, 10.3 million acres of forest land were converted <br />to development. By 2050, an additional 23 million <br />acres of forest land may be lost.4 This trend indicates a <br />decline in the ecological health of rural communities, <br />but it also means that the forestry-based economy of <br />some rural communities may be in jeopardy and that <br />the landscapes that have defined many communities <br />are changing. Many rural communities are concerned <br />that these changes may have a negative impact on <br />tourism and their residents' quality of life. <br />Rapid growth at metropolitan edges <br />Across the country, the highest rates of population <br />growth have been occurring at the edges of metro- <br />politan areas, where suburban and rural areas meet. <br />In the mid- 1990s, three - quarters of all new residential <br />development was built at or beyond the urban edge. <br />Nearly all of this development occurred on lots that <br />are one acre or larger.5 Such development, which con- <br />sumes 1.2 million acres of prime farmland every year,6 <br />may appear somewhat rural from the road but actually <br />undermines the viability of a resource -based economy. <br />Low - density and single -use development patterns also <br />result in additional population growth and increas- <br />ing demands for services, often in places where it is <br />inefficient to provide them. Edge communities, due to <br />their rapidly growing populations, may face infrastruc- <br />The number of farms and farmers has <br />been declining since the end of World War <br />ll, as farmland has been developed and <br />large corporate farms have replaced small <br />family farms. <br />lure challenges and find it difficult to provide new <br />infrastructure and services at a rate that keeps up with <br />population growth. Higher population growth and <br />commutes to non -farm jobs increase traffic congestion <br />along rural routes. As growth occurs in some regional <br />areas, tensions often develop between the "new" and <br />'.old" residents. Edge communities, which border both <br />urban and rural areas, and resource - dependent com- <br />munities may see nuisance lawsuits, which are com- <br />mon, due to newcomers' concerns about the noise, <br />odor, dust, etc., that occur with normal operation of <br />working lands. <br />Shrinking population in other areas <br />While some areas struggle to keep up with growth, <br />other regions have the opposite problem. According <br />to the USDA, one in four rural counties saw a drop in <br />population between 1990 and 2000, primarily due to <br />declining farm employment, remoteness from metro- <br />politan areas, and a lack of amenities like a vibrant <br />Main Street or natural features.' Communities with <br />declining populations or a contracting economy face a <br />combination of problems: unemployment and poverty, <br />increasing demands for social services with fewer <br />dollars to pay for them, an aging workforce, vacant <br />properties, and loss of historic structures. Attempts to <br />compete with other jurisdictions for large economic <br />development projects, such as new manufacturing <br />plants, office parks, or regional big box retailers, may <br />come at the expense of local businesses and the com- <br />munity ties they aim to support. <br />Z <br />0 <br />a <br />93 <br />