Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-19-2010 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 08-19-2010 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 08-19-2010 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2015 1:40:07 PM
Creation date
8/16/2010 11:14:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2010
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 08-19-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
irr- <br />STRATEGY 5 <br />ALI <br />North Carolina Department of Economic Development), regional level (e.g. Research <br />Triangle Partnership), and local level (e.g. Town of Chapel Hill Economic Development <br />Office, Orange County Office of Economic Development, Visitors Bureau, Chamber of <br />Commerce, etc.) that are designed to focus interest and economic activity. It is the <br />consultants opinion that if policy and positioning strategies are put into place, a more <br />aggressive and result - oriented promotional strategy can be put into effect through <br />increased communication and shared tactical efforts with these and other organizations. <br />Some particular suggestions for the promotion element of an office market capture <br />strategy include, but are not limited to the following: <br />Mandate that departments and organizations which perform promotional <br />activities for the Town coordinate efforts with a clear leadership hierarchy in <br />terms of pursuing capture of the office market (in this case). <br />Merge the objectives of the Town with regard to office prosperity and <br />development (as evidenced by the policy and positioning actions) with those of <br />the Research Triangle Partnership especially. If they are already considered <br />merged, then we suggest a higher level merger. <br />Fund these efforts through traditional and creative revenue streams — possibly <br />tied to results in some fashion— that enable the promotional team to do its job <br />effectively, and to enable competition at the global level. This will involve a <br />public investment, but the anticipated economic and fiscal impacts should easily <br />offset the cost. <br />8.4 Economic and Fiscal Impact Potential <br />The logic for pursuing additional office development in Chapel Hill is based on this <br />sector's ability to contribute to the economic and fiscal base of the community through <br />net -new property and personal property taxes, job creation, expenditure of wages and <br />salaries, spending by operations, etc. A complete economic and fiscal impact analysis of <br />future office potential in Chapel Hill was beyond the scope of this assignment however <br />some illustrative projections may be useful. The Statistical Abstract of the U.S. and U.S. <br />Census Data are the primary sources for these projections. All numbers are expressed as <br />2010 dollars. <br />Using the current Effective Combined Rate in Chapel Hill, each $100,000 of <br />property value generates approximately $1,338 dollars in total tax property <br />revenue (distributed to various entities). <br />• Using the net additional office supply (Section 7) projection of 1 million square <br />feet and a unit cost of construction of $200 per square foot (2010 dollars), and <br />market valuation/assessment using those variables, a net new taxable base of $200 <br />million is derived. <br />43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.