Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-19-2010 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 08-19-2010 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 08-19-2010 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2015 1:40:07 PM
Creation date
8/16/2010 11:14:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2010
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 08-19-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' STRA MG 5 <br />:1 <br />Constraints to Increasing / Capturing Demand <br />While opportunities for increasing and or capturing demand outweigh the constraints to <br />the same objective there are practical obstacles to be acknowledged. These include: <br />• The ability of Chapel Hill to capture demand for office space may be eventually <br />limited by its capacity to provide a commensurate supply of building space given <br />the relatively limited amount of land which is available and/or approved for this <br />type of use. <br />• Limited land resources are further constrained for development by associated <br />zoning and regulatory restrictions, an apparently complex and time (cost) <br />consuming approvals process, etc. <br />• Property tax rates are high relative to competitive office markets elsewhere in the <br />Research Triangle. An in -depth comparative tax analysis was beyond the scope of <br />this report but available data and input from local real estate professionals, <br />property developers, etc. seems to support this contention. <br />• Land prices are high relative to competitive office markets elsewhere. As with a <br />tax analysis, in -depth comparative land valuation was beyond the scope of this <br />assignment but input and anecdotal information suggests it is essentially true. <br />• Cost differential — the cost of second generation space in RTP is significantly <br />lower and the added costs of taxes and land noted above contribute to the cost <br />differential and constitute a constraint to capturing demand. <br />• The addition of attractive /cost effective space into the market elsewhere will <br />continue to be a constraint as competition from other communities will likely <br />increase. This also raises the issue of "leakage" of demand from Chapel Hill, and <br />the converse opportunity of "retention" which both figure strongly in the overall <br />market context. <br />• Increased marketing efforts by other competitive markets including international, <br />national, and regional activities elsewhere. More locally, competitive <br />marketing /capture efforts by Alamance, Chatham, Durham and Wake Counties <br />need to be particularly recognized. <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.