Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-19-2010 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 08-19-2010 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 08-19-2010 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2015 1:40:07 PM
Creation date
8/16/2010 11:14:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2010
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 08-19-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C S- MATEGY S <br />[:I <br />Section 4: Public Process Discussion <br />As part of the non - traditional market analysis approach employed in this study, Strategy 5 <br />and the Economic Development Office conducted a public process to both gather input <br />and information; and, to inform office development and management companies, <br />business and property owners; stakeholders and the general public about the study and its <br />objectives. <br />On January 20th a public workshop was held that attracted approximately 25 participants <br />from the commercial real estate sector, public officials, representatives of various Chapel <br />Hill organizations, etc. The input and discussion ranged widely concerning: the office <br />market, constraints and advantages that are experienced by the market in Chapel Hill (and <br />the Research Triangle generally). The workshop, which was organized by the Economic <br />Development Office, provided an excellent platform for an exchange of information and <br />opinions, as well as an opportunity to gain contact information for industry participants. <br />On February 12th a second public workshop was held in which preliminary observations, <br />finds and recommendations of the study were presented for discussion. Approximately 30 <br />participants were involved in this interchange and a second round of valuable input was <br />received. <br />In addition to the public meetings a series of one -on -one stakeholder interviews were <br />conducted either in person or on the telephone. These interviews provided added depth to <br />the understanding of nuances and subtleties in the local office market and the forces <br />which influence it. <br />4.1 Summary of Observations <br />In general the input from the public process was positive with regard to the office market, <br />but also evidentiary of frustration; much of the latter apparently directed at the <br />development approvals process which seems to inhibit developer (i.e. investor) interest. <br />Frustration aside, there is obviously a great deal of pride in Chapel Hill, and there was a <br />conveyed sense that the Town commands a certain pinnacle status within the Triangle: <br />"You may ,have to pay a premium, but it's worth it," is the message received. <br />On a different level the public process also revealed some business models that seem to <br />be succeeding where others are not. There appears to be a trend toward demand for <br />smaller office space requirements (e.g. 5,000 square feet as opposed to 10,000 square <br />feet) predicated in part on advances in technology and concurrent reductions in workforce <br />needs, desire for flex space and highly flexible lease agreements, and a demand driver <br />which is proximity to support infrastructure by walking — even though the perception of <br />some complexes in this regard (i.e. I have to drive anywhere) is not necessarily the reality <br />(i.e. It's really not that far). <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.