Orange County NC Website
:;'y' ; <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner Carey to <br />adopt a resolution in support of flat-rate extended area service as requested by TJCOC <br />and as stated below and to send copies as directed in the abstract: <br />WHEREAS, the continuing growth of the Research Triangle Area has created a mare <br />interactive and economically interdependent geographic area, and, <br />WHEREAS, communications is an essential tool for business growth and personal use, <br />and, <br />WHEREAS, the existing telephones are operating in a fashion that does not <br />facilitate integrated growth in the Research Triangle Area, and, <br />WHEREAS, the Region's competitive edge in attracting industry to a high technology <br />market is dependent on the quality and accessibility of the telecommunications <br />infrastructure, <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Orange County Board of Commissioners ,supports <br />the implementation of flat-rate Extended Area Service for Durham, Orange, and Wake <br />Counties including the Clayton and Pittsboro exchanges. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br />E. REPORTS <br />1. REGIONAL TRANSIT PROPOSAL (A copy of the draft report on the possibilities of <br />a Regional Transportation Authority is in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's <br />Office) . <br />Mr. Patrick B. Simmons, Assistant Director of the State Public Transportation <br />Division summarized the report. His main emphasis was an receiving recommendations for <br />the creation of a regional public transit authority. The Issues Paper lists the - <br />issues surrounding the formation and financing of this authority. He used <br />transparencies to exemplify his comments on the forming of this authority. He outlined <br />the goals, functions, financing and governing of the authority as listed in the Issue ' <br />Paper and described the options available for each of these items. He described three <br />models from which this Regional Transportation Authority could be formed and the <br />advantages and disadvantages of each. <br />Commissianer Marshall spoke opposing the use of ad valorem taxes to finance a <br />public transit system. She stressed that how the system is financed is critically <br />important to the overall acceptance and use by the citizenry. <br />Commissioner Hartwell questioned why ad valorem taxes was listed as a <br />financing option when the County is not going to finance a system using ad valorem <br />taxes. He was told that in principle ad valorem taxes is an option. Commissioner <br />Hartwell stated that listing ad valorem taxes will bring out the opposition for <br />essentially no point. He emphasized that people are not going to use the system if <br />they don't have t$e flexibility to stop at several places along the way to da errands <br />or pick up kids. Simmons agreed with Hartwell. <br />Commissioner Marshall asked if there had been any plans or thoughts about <br />moving people around in the Research Triangle Park and Simmons stated that this would <br />be one thing that the Regional Transportation Authority would manage. Two studies are <br />underway at this time on this problem. <br />Simmons noted that a report will be written on the consensus in this area and <br />it will be presented to the TAC's for their input and resolution of support. It will <br />be brought back to the Soard of Commissioners in early Spring for a final presentation <br />to solicit support, endorsement, and help with introducing legislation in this session <br />of the General Assembly. <br />2. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY (A copy of the report is in the <br />Commissioners' Library). <br />