Browse
Search
Minutes - 19880816
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1988
>
Minutes - 19880816
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2013 10:36:58 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:57:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/16/1988
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r;:y name ~s Boyce gown. 1' m an ura-i~.e .,ouri-;.y -~Gx:idve~ . •,- ~:• su r,„ucr: <br />attention having been given to the siting of a reservoir in Northern <br />County, two things have been overlooked. The first is that a re servoi~~ <br />not a foregone conclusion. but will be decided by the Orange County voters <br />in Navembe r. The second is the reason for a reservoir. Hillsborough has <br />recently offered water to OWASA and approved new water and sewer lines, so <br />immediate water needs don't seem paramount. but for future growth and <br />development a reservoir would be a necessity. Already there is a long list <br />of developments waiting for water. Orange County taxpayers deserve to know <br />what is being planned for their tax dollars, not just the purchase of land <br />for a reservoir, but the development which will ensue and how this will affec~ <br />taxes and the environment. <br />To build a reservoir would be to repeat the same environmentally <br />destructive patterns that have characterized the use of the Eno for <br />generations. A reservoir might alleviate water needs far a few years, but <br />would leave us in the future with the same old problems, only worsened. Them <br />is another way, but it would mean changes in our relations with ourselves ; <br />and with nature and a change from our current business as usual growth ethici <br />to a steady-state society. These last are the thoughts of MXT scientists <br />and other scholars. <br />Y believe that the people are ready to make that transition, but that <br />it is our institutions, governmental, educational and business, that are as <br />yet unwilling to make the change. <br />If our concern were truly with the restoration and preservation of the <br />Eno, with learning its limits and living within those limits, there is an <br />environmentally sound direction we could take. we could focus our attention <br />on water reduction, reuse and conservation. This is not just a vision. In <br />a book called We All Live Downstream, the way to achieve such a goal is <br />demonstrated. There are about eight waterless human waste composters listed, <br />as well as ways to reuse water and to conserve. In a federally funded study <br />conducted in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, a house by house poll revealed that <br />2~~ of the city's water/sewer customers were interested in making the <br />transition to appropriate or.-site waste systems., This doesn't indicate that <br />such technology or acceptance is a quantum leap away, but that the public <br />could be ready for new directions. A pilot project for conversion to on- si" <br />waste composters was developed, but not yet realized. <br />We could set up a similar pilot project and bring it into being. creati: <br />a number of water efficient houses, testing different or.-site waste camposti: <br />systems, grevwater reuse and water saving devices, with the ex~ectat~an that <br />this information could be used to retrofit every existing building and <br />installed in new buildings in the Eno watershed, going beyond political <br />boundaries and being a truly bioregional approach. <br />This way wouldn't be an easy or a quick way, but it could be 2. means ow <br />not only restoring the Eno, but restaging a sense of commur:ity whic^ is now <br />sadly lacking. <br />If such a course were followed, and in ten or twenty years, the ~o <br />watershed was the first ir, America to unhook its sewer lines and close down <br />its sewer treatment plants, this would be ar. accomrlishment. Compare this <br />with being simply one mare area which built a reservoir, and then whose <br />livability was destroyed by endless development which enriched a few but <br />imx~overished the rest of us. There is no comparison. <br />1~iy wish is that you would <br />I realize this is useless, but <br />development DCCUrS and trarric <br />the climate even hotter and dr <br />built Dyer, rivers and streams <br />..- ..., 1_ ~, ~ ~. _ - - ~ - - , _- _ ._.- 1 ,.. ~ 1 ~ <br />remove the reservoir from the bond issue. <br />if a reservoir is built and large scale <br />becomes even heavier, the air more unbreatha~: <br />yer, woods destroyed, the earth paved and <br />further de~le ted, along v~'wth our tax <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.