Orange County NC Website
~~~ <br />E. REPORTS <br />1. MANAGER'S PROPOSED BUDGET PRESENTATION <br />County Manager John Link stated that the 39 million dollar budget outlines a <br />progressive plan and service system for Orange Gounty for the next fiscal. year. The <br />major components of the budget include emphasis an education and human services. There <br />is a significant increase in outside agency appropriations. Improvement of the county's <br />financial position was a main objective in the budget to prepare the county for the <br />future bond referendum. Link continued with a slide presentation outlining the major <br />impacts of the budget and the expected revenues. In order to fund the recommended <br />budget a tax rate of 64.5 cents would be required (increase of 3.9 cents) and an <br />increase of 2.2 cents for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School District Tax. He described <br />the budget objectives which were used as guidelines for making the decisions in the <br />recommended budget. The current expense x'equest from the. Chapel Hill-Garrboro School <br />system was $932 per student from county funds plus $904 p.er student from the district <br />tax. Orange County requested $1017 per student for current expense. In the recommended <br />budget $950 per student is recommended for both school systems. <br />Link highlighted the significant increases in the budget and explained those <br />increases. He reviewed the new County positions included in the recommended budget and <br />listed the school capital projects. <br />In conclusion, Link stated that the proposed budget is a reflection of the <br />county's efforts to respond to the changes of the community and diversified service <br />needs for the citizens of Orange County. <br />The Board members asked specific questions to which John Link answered. <br />2. LOW/MOD HOUSING TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS (A copy of the staff implementation <br />report is in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office) <br />Director of Housing and Community Development Tara Fikes summarized the report <br />and stated that several of the recommendations are in progress and scheduling has been <br />done to implement those recommendations. Recommendations 2, 3 and 10 have been <br />completed. All planning items -- recommendations 4, 5, 6a and 8a have been scheduled <br />for review in October of 1988 with public hearing in November of 1988. She pointed out <br />that recommendation 6b pertaining to the study of public transportation in Orange County <br />was being done by the Orange County Transportation Board and the task force supports <br />those efforts. Recommendation 3b and 7d peztain to the establishment of a local housing <br />and trust fund. House Bill 328 was passed by the General Assembly last year and gave <br />cities and housing .authorities the authority to provide local funds for low and moderate <br />income housing. However, this authority was not extended to counties. <br />Chair Marshall asked that a bill be prepared for review by the Commissioners by <br />November which would include counties in this legislation. <br />F. ITEMS FOR DECISION = CONSENT AGENDA <br />(ANY ITEM MAY BE REMOVED FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION) <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to <br />approve the items as stated below: <br />1. LEGAL SERVICES CONTRACT - GHILD SUPPORT <br />To approve the contract with Goleman, Bernholz, Dickerson, Bernholz, Gledhill and <br />Hargrave, Attorneys at Law to provide legal representation for the Child Support Office <br />dated July 1, 1988. <br />2. LISTING OF EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBERS IN TELEPHONE DIRECTORIES FOR HAZARDOUS <br />MATERIALS <br />