Orange County NC Website
11~ <br />The planning principles are appropriate for inclusion in the Orange <br />County Comprehensive Plan, as the Recreation and Parks Element. The <br />financial data is appropriate for utilization in Orange County's 5-year <br />capital improvement planning efforts, to be reviewed annually. <br />__ The financial data has been recently reviewed in light of much <br />public discussion in recent months concerning the broad scope of the Plan. <br />If funding support of the Plan is to be realized, it is important that <br />monies requested are clearly identified with specific projects. <br />To provide this focus, it is recommended that the CIP Request be <br />broken down into funding for (a) pools, (b) park development (for three <br />existing publicly-owned sites), and (c) park lands fund. <br />Specifically: <br />POOLS Two (2) pools - one to be located in the Chapel Hill <br />$3,260,000 and one in the Hillsborough area. <br />PARK DEVELOPMENT Development of existing publicly-owned sites. <br />$738,000 Efland-Cheeks Community Park $ 113,000 <br />Fairview Community Park 436,000 <br />Cane Creek District Park 189,000 <br />PARK LANDS FUND Acreage for park development as future population demand <br />$600,000 warrants. Use of these monies would include securing <br />options on properties. <br />5-YEAR CIP REQUEST: <br />Pools <br />Park Development <br />Contingency <br />Park Lands Fund <br />$ 3,260,000 <br />738,000 <br />399,800 <br />_ 600,000 <br />$ 4,997,800 TOTAL <br />This recommendation results in a reprioritization of the project <br />elements in the first five-year planning period and focuses efforts on <br />development of three projects on existing publicly-owned facilities. This <br />recommendation results in a $1,505,000 difference (compared with the <br />original plan request) in needed funding for the first five-year planning <br />period. This significant cost difference is caused by the exclusion of all <br />but $600,000 in park land funds in the first five year planning period. <br />2. PROPOSED TEEN SYMPOSIUM <br />Fletcher Barber as a representative of the Human Services <br />Management Team presented a tentative planning structure for a teen <br />symposium. He explained that the team tried to identify all the youth <br />agencies or groups in the County that provides youth services. A list of <br />these agencies was included as part of the agenda abstract. A symposium <br />steering committee will be selected from the list of youth agency <br />providers. Their mission will be to (1) finalize goals and objectives for <br />the symposium, (2) develop a mechanism which permits input from youth <br />groups not serving on the steering committee and (3) establish symposium <br />logistics. <br />Chair Marshall asked that emphasis be placed on the teen problems <br />that deal with teens moving on into adulthood. The Board Members will call <br />Mr. Barber with additional names of youth agency providers. Commissioner <br />Halkiotis asked that the scope of the symposium be expanded to include the <br />enforcement issue of alcohol and drugs. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner <br />Halkiotis to approve the plan of action as proposed. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br />