Orange County NC Website
~~ DON INGRAHAM member of the Animal Control Task Force, informed the <br />public that the members of the task force were concerned about the <br />economic impact of the licensing fee on older people and that the original <br />ordinance did contain a section for waiver of fees for financial hardship. <br />The ordinance does allow the Animal Control Director to submit to the <br />Board of Commissioners a policy which would allow for payment of fees over 'l'~ <br />extended periods of time at reduced rates or waiver of fees. With <br />reference to the overpopulation of animals, he stated that one way to ..? <br />control this population. is to have a differential licensing program <br />coupled with an effective animal control program. <br />PAT SANFORD pointed out that the basic problem in Orange County is <br />the overpopulation of animals. There has been a 70% increase in the <br />number of animals at the shelter. In January, 1988 there was a 19; <br />increase over January of 1987. She distributed statistical information to <br />the Board members. She spoke in support of the ordinance and compared the <br />cost of feeding and raising an animal with the amount of the fee. She <br />noted a need for educating the public on the reason for these fees and the <br />need for control of the animal population. <br />MORLAND CLAYTOR noted she raises dogs primarily for purchase by older <br />people. She gave several illustrations of the need for companionship <br />which is given by animals. <br />Health Director Dan Reimer reported that the Board of Health was asked <br />by the Board of Commissioners to consider a lower fee for those owners who <br />have more than three dogs or cats. The Health Board voted 6-3 to leave <br />the fees unchanged. The two reasons for leaving the fee unchanged were <br />(l) the number of cats and dogs is growing rapidly and it was felt that <br />any change in the fees would undermine the effort of the ordinance in <br />control of the animal population and (2) with a growth in animal `"` <br />population, the spread of rabies also increases which in turn presents a <br />danger to the welfare of the public. <br />Commissioner Carey stated that as a member of the Board of Health, he <br />asked the Health Board to consider charging the higher fee for the first <br />five animals and a lower fee for the remaining animals. His proposal was <br />based on the rationale for determining the number of animals that required <br />a person to register as a kennel operator and the standards that applied <br />to that category. <br />Commissioner Carey made a motion that the higher fee be charged for <br />the first five animals in a household that are unsterilized and a lower <br />fee be charged for all unsterilized animals above five in the same <br />household. Commissioner Hartwell seconded the proposal. <br />A second proposal by Commissioner Carey which was referred to the <br />County Manager for implementation next fiscal year was to consider a <br />spay/neuter subsidy which would reimburse all or part of the cost for low <br />income individuals who have their animals spayed or neutered. <br />Commissioner Willhoit raised concern about the portion of the <br />ordinance dealing with enforcement that will reduce the animal population <br />and expressed his doubts that an increase in the fees charged placed the <br />emphasis in the right place. He emphasized that reducing the number of <br />dogs that will be registed will not meet the overall objective. While the <br />tax should be progressive, tripleing the fee is one year may be excessive. <br />Commissioner Hartwell spoke in support of lower licensing fees in <br />an effort to reduce the economic impact on the rural residents of the <br />County and supported a program which would offer incentives to have <br />animals sterilized. <br />A substitute motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by <br />Commissioner Willhoit to change the licensing tax that is presently in <br />