Orange County NC Website
10 H <br />1 <br />z <br />3 <br />to January 4, 1988. <br />Vote : Tlnans.maus . <br />4 <br />5 McLennan's Farm Continuation of 1.1/23/87 public hearing. <br />6 <br />7 Presentation by Marvin Collins. <br />8 <br />g Collins stated that the application in question is for a Planned Deve ap- <br />tD ment Housing Project in the Rural Buffer area surrounding Chapel Hill and <br />11 Carrboro. It involves approximately 37 acres an Bowden Road and 1/2 mile <br />12 south of old Greensboro Highway. The proposed development would consist <br />i3 of fourteen residential lots averaging slightly over two acres in size. <br />14 The remaining property would be comprised of a community nitrification <br />i5 field far sewage disposal and also open space/recreation area for the <br />1b development. He noted that the recommendations of the Recreation Dire~9~7 <br />17 and comments from NCDdT had been presented at the November 23, <br />18 meeting. The continuation of the public hearing was to review comments <br />19 from OWASA and the Town of Carrboro. He indicated that the Planning Staff <br />20 has met with OWASA Staff and has reviewed the Town of Carrboro comments. <br />21 The comments from OWASA and the Town of Carrboro as well as the Planning <br />22 Staff's responses are included as attachments to these minutes. <br />23 <br />~4 After reviewing the comments, responses and additional information <br />25 provided by the applicant, as well as the site plan and all of the <br />supports-ng documentation, the Planning Staff is recommending approval with <br />26 <br />27 twenty-four conditions. These conditions address deficiencies that the <br />28 Planning Staff found in the application in terms of information lacking "''',~ <br />29 they also address the comments from the Town of Carrboro, NCDOT, inc.. <br />30 OWASA. The conditions also include standard conditions which are s_ncor~.:_;;.:: <br />31 porated into any planned development application. Those conditions are as <br />32 follows: <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 Article 8.2.2 states that where a preponderance of evidence indicates <br />36 compliance with the general standards, specific rules governing the <br />37 specific use, and that the use complies with all required regulations and <br />3g standards, the application must be approved unless it is f ound, in same <br />39 specific manner, that: <br />~o <br />~1 1. The use will not promote the public health, safety and general welfare <br />t,2 if located where proposed and developed and operated according to the <br />43 plan as submitted; <br />4~+ <br />~+5 2. The use will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property; <br />46 <br />47 3. The use is not in compliance with the general plans for the physical <br />~g development of the county as embodied in these regulations ar in the <br />4g Comprehensive Plan, or portion thereof, adopted by the Orange County <br />5p Board of Commissioners. <br />51 The burden of proving one or more of the above findings is on those <br />53 oPPosing the application. The proof must also be in the form of compete ~~ <br />,~ material and substantial evidence. <br />55 <br />56 No information has been received which would establish grounds far making <br />57 one or more of the above findings. <br />58 <br />59 <br />