Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-20-1998 - 10a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 01-20-1998
>
Agenda - 01-20-1998 - 10a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2010 9:18:52 AM
Creation date
7/27/2010 9:18:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/20/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19980120
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J <br />To: John Link, Counry Manager -~~ <br />From: Gayle Wilson. Solid Waste Management Department <br />Subject: Response to Question on development of transfer station and materials recovery <br />facility <br />Date: November 13, 1997 <br />What is the feasibility of developing a transfer station and a materials recovery facility <br />(ZtiiFt17 including possible costs and sites. <br />Introduction <br />Both a transfer station and a materials recovery facility (MRl7 could be developed at a <br />variety of sites in Orange Counry using any combination of public and private ownership <br />and operation. State and federal siting regulations are far less onerous for these types of <br />facilities than for landfills. Environmental monitoring needs are limited compared to <br />landfills which must monitor for groundwater contamination and methane generation as <br />well as develop long term post-closure plans. <br />The Greene Tract is a possible site for either a transfer station or a materials recovery <br />facility provided that local zoning regulations allow either one or both. Other sites <br />adjoining the existing landfill or throughout the County are also feasible. Sites chosen <br />for transfer stations and MRFs should be near good transportation networks and close_ to <br />the centers of waste generation to achieve efficiency in transportation. Both transfer <br />stations and materials recovery facilities have been built in all types of settings including <br />adjoining residential areas. <br />Either type of facility could be built on 12 to IS acres including ample buffer areas. It is <br />possible to site both facilities on a single parcel that might have to be greater than 12 to <br />15 acres but not double the siu needed for the individual facilities. Land quality and <br />utility requirements would be similar to that needed for other industrial facilities. <br />Transfer S Cations <br />~ transfer station is an enclosed facility that consolidates waste from a variety of smaller <br />trucks for reloading into single larger transfer trailers capable of transporting as much as <br />twenty tons of waste to a distant disposal facility. Typically hauls of greater than 20 <br />miles one-way to landfills or other disposal facilities make transfer stations economical. <br />All the private, licensed facilities investigated by WESTON as part of the out-of-county <br />alternatives report issued to the Owners Group in July 1995 were further than twenty <br />miles from Orange County. The private landfill to which Durham plans to ship its waste <br />is over 100 miles away. . <br />Transfer stations are capable of handling both mixed solid waste and construction and <br />demolition wastes, both of which are now received at the Orange Regional Landfill. Ie is <br />somewhat more costly to design a facility capable of handling the construction and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.