Orange County NC Website
_ Table ES-4 <br />Summary of Scores of Disposal Options <br />~ ~~)t!f'IOiL ~, ~ ~~>}~ , ~~ttlOt <br />t~~ ~.~JWIs <br />~ <br />(x ~'~EIOQ Qp~ ~ EiOIL <br /> ~q~ ~ <br />;yyy{ . <br />~ ~~ yr~ <br /> <br />Protection of I7 10 10 IS 16 15 11 <br />Environment and <br />Public Health <br />Consistency with 20 10 15 16 10 14 13 <br />Goals and ObjectiveR <br />•Ecoaomic Feasibility 11 10 9 11 7 4 11 <br />Social and Political 10 9 9 8 10 6 6 <br />Impact <br />Comprehensiveness 10 6 9 9 3 7 4 <br />Integration 10 7 8 7 6 7 3 <br />Practicality 7 6 6 6 6 6 4 <br />Composite Score 85 58 66 72 SS 59 ~ 52 <br />~~ <br />Special Lssues <br />Several important issues regarding this evaluation include: <br />• Land banking may be desirable when considering the use of a private out-of- <br />county facility. This decision is dependent on the availability of alternatives to <br />the selected option as well as other factors. <br />• Out-of-county facilities generally do not have the same incentives to reduce as the <br />in-county landfill option; however, these incentives could be applied at the <br />transfer station facility. <br />• Given the complexity of legal issues regarding liability, it is difficult to compare <br />the liability associated with the options. <br />NOR/K1~1 t o~90\ EDO_t •S.WP ~ _'~ ~/~ <br />