Agenda - 01-20-1998 - 10a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

all the plarn protocols for reculations. ur_ders tanding 5 T ~ :__^_g and inspection departments agree to similar inspection and enforce.*nent of solid waste plan If the ordina_zces differed significantly, and joint enforcement would be difficult. we suggest that a reciprocal agree.*nent for the use of the plan inspector in various jurisdictions be established. Reciprocal agree.*nents already authorize building inspection staff from Chapel Hill to work in Carrboro and vice versa. Inspections in all jurisdictions would ~.ave to be coordinated to incorporate the solid waste inspection at crucial points during construction. Thus inspections departments could infora the solid waste plan inspector of the progress on various projects. Additional Work for Existing Staff we believe that implementation of a solid. waste planning ordinar_ce would create some furtr_er workload in the planning and inspection' depart~-nents of each jurisdicti oa. That work would be primarily a need to coordinate development review to ensure that the developer has a solid waste plan in place prior to permit approval and that the project designer(s) are aware of all three aspects of a plan - construction waste management, use of materials with recycled content, and provision of storage space. for recyclables for the finished projecc. The plan inspector would, to the e_~ctent possible, minimize increases in workload of the various pla_*ining and inspection departments. Existing solid :paste staff is prepared to minimize additional wort{ by assisting each jurisdiction in writing the solid waste pla_T ordina_*:ce, conducting builder education and other•~aise cooperating with the current pla_*uiing and inspection staff to i *_npiEine.^_t tai s progr~ia. ?_t least or_e mew*-iner of each plar~ing deartment and each bui ld'_ .g i~pection department would need to be =o roughly familiar wit: t~E p~CDOScG SOIi d Waste pla_~^___^_C regula_iOiIS and prOCeSS25. CO^C~'1s? OP_ Red::c:.ion of construction a_~d demolition waste will save valua:~le la_rd_'_~l space and help meet adopted was_? reduction goals. .t soLld also ultiaately help bu'_lders recce costs by Enforc'_rc ~raste reduction, wise use of materials and grope= separatior_ far rn~ JClinC. ' Nit :out any t_rp a of proc=_ssing facility, the implementation o= a solid waste pla: ^ing fu_rctior_ will Effec_:ively impact or_ly c_Ea_^: WOOd Waste a.^_d ~:~eta1S . T.=e52 rcDre5E31t a.*1 ODDOr~L.*].1tV tO diVEr~ a cracti cal :aaximum of or_ly 10~s of consz_sctioa and. dEmolitio.^_ wast_ if SOBS of each matErial tvoe were diverted from source separation. ~~7it no facilities o= ar_y k_ .d available at the