Agenda - 01-20-1998 - 10a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~ large ar„ounts of corrucated car board to recycling crop oL= . sites. • No requirement to submit a solid waste plan to handle .demolition waste. Development plans are often submitted SubSeeue_Zt to de.*nolition of a_*~ existing building on the site of a project requiring a special use permit. Thus the demolition is r_ot subject to any waste reduction regulations. • Limited ability to have an imaact anv projects undertaken on the cam us of the IIniversity of North Carolina. In February 1996, Chapel Hill solid waste staff met with WC construction planning staff to discuss ways to make the solid waste planning ordinance more effective on campus. UNC construction planning staff agreed to administer t'_:e solid waste plar~iing ordinance for aTI campus projects. Our field observations of WC's demolition ar_d remodeling projects have not revealed a_*iy on-site recycling efforts. Our limited follow-up with GNC const=action planning sta~f has not s~.own any major implementation of construction waste reduction through their' application of solid waste pla_^~ ing ordinance. Follow-up with other Local jurisdictions in Oraage County Nor_e of the other three jurisdic.~ions has a solid waste plan Ordinance in effect, although sta== from all thre° have e:cpressed some interest in this. The July 11, 1990', memorandum to the Owners Group "=ollow-uD Items on Construction and Demolition ~~caste Reduction Planning', contai__^_ed SDECif1C recommendations for a more effective ordina.*ice. This memorandum contains further specifics about what could be included in such an ordinance. $ta== =rvm Chapel Frill $o lid 'Haste Deea_ moment met with various sta== me_*nbers with Carrboro, a_-±d Orange County pla_*ining a_*id buildi_^_a i_^_scectior_s staff in ?.uc-.:st to =urther discuss those _ssues. Discussion z'uading a Solid Waste Plan Inspector Position and a Laadfill Materials Inspectioa Position ___ :. he Dece.Ticer 12 me*nora.*idun to the Ow=_e=s Group, "?ollow-~,:n ~.=_o_ t ct Cptior_s for Reduci_^_g Co-struct_on and Demolition ~cas ~_" , t e Staf 51CCested t .t t e OWT°_r5 GrOL'D CO.^.S:C~r a =ecor,,-~encation to the member coverninents that a solid waste nla_^_ _-specccr bE added to the Solid .'caste staff if all gover,_nents adcpcE_ solid waste pla_*is . This : ositicn would be necessa_~-1 to pry:_c°_ adE^.:ate plait rEVieTid a_rG _ns~ect_Or.; Current- SO1_d waste stc-- 15 WGrkig at full CdpaC_tV. ~ _ inOr:lation 'nlaS prOV1CEd about fi~anGing this D0S2.tiOn u5i C ~a per:^.lt =e° tiE^. to the dollar value of t E project. The s::cgested 'ee :Jas $0.042 per 6?00 of pe=-fitted valuE. This would