Agenda - 01-20-1998 - 10a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

$900, 000. .~n.*lual tra__^_sporr_ation costs could rarce __crt "' $175,000* to $350,000* dEDE^diP_g on distance to the facility and $726,000 to $825,000 in tipping fees there. Some r_sk would exist cue to possible future ur_availability of reasonably • pro:cimate disposal capacity. Additional management cost per ton would ra_*:ge from $9.90 to $15.15* (Originally $10.50 to 516.20) . [j . C'nne~+-+irt a nlantla~ TV-Oriont2d C&~ waste r°_C~C~ ? _^_Q ~aC~ 1' tV, Cniiril Ari wit'' some additional di S~OSal area for the ?'_OP_- recvclable -esiduals. This facility would provide for ha.:d- picking of materials from a covered tipping floor. Materials to be re_^~oved would be about 50~ of clean wood, about 50~ of clean metals and the 50$ of dry wall we estimate is delivered to the facil'_ty~already source separated. The LOG estimat_s a -15~ overall potential diversion rate from alI construction waste. T`e estimated capital and land cost is $1,080,000. ?.bout 25 additional acres would need to be acquired for this option; ten acres for processing and 15 acres for a residual disposal (~,vh'_ch would provide about 7 years of additional capacity). additional maaage.*ne_nt cost per ton would be about $17.70*(was r~4.60). g , ~nr~r-~••-r a semi-automated C&D waste recvclinc and recOV2~^I ?~~ ~ ; rv cat:~T ed w~ th acdi ti oral di soosal• area for the nor_- ~-ecvclable ~=siduals (staff recommendation). This facility has the potentia'_ to recover more materials than a manual facility. The LOG est'-:iates that such a facility is the only option that could divert a minimum 25~ of C&D materials and satisfy slat=_ a_~d :CG :last= reduction goals. Esti.''ated potential costs are about $1.55 .:.illion. ~~out 25 additional acres would need to :.e acquired `or this option; ten acres for processing and 15 acres for res'_dual disposal (which would provide about 8 years of additior_a_ capacity). Additional manage_*nent cost per ton ~,JOUId be abou_ $20.50* (was $18.70) . Cu==ently t e a_:dfill =end's cost of -anagir_g C&D i s about $lo' per tor_; ~owev~=, the C&D disposal tipping fee is $33 per to . ^he acded cast ;.er ton is relati.e to the c'===ent S16 . per ccr_ .:;a =ace^e ~ cos . for ooti ons 2-~ . ^_' ___ actual elect of a .y ~rvCrc.'1 On t =E L1Dp? ng Lee wOUld 'var! depending uDOn hGW t E rCCr~3 iS i~:p:e_°:lented and what Ot her progra-ns are fundEd thraug~l tl~~~rC Le~S: (1nr±nn 3 Option 1 Optioa Z Optioa 3 Optioa 4 Optioa 5 ~;ecc_~nt~or_ Added cost/_or_ No -e*.~ landfill or facility Of a_ry ki*_d $5.45 La,df__1 only, no waste red~.:cticn. $ 0 • 6Q Tra_*:s . er s tation to s::ip wastes out : $ 9 • ° 0 tc $15.15 .~a,^_ual waste rsducti on facility (15~ recucti or_) . $17 . i 0 Semi-automated waste reduction =acility s20.s0