Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-20-1998 - 10a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 01-20-1998
>
Agenda - 01-20-1998 - 10a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2010 9:18:52 AM
Creation date
7/27/2010 9:18:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/20/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19980120
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,~ <br />i <br />8 <br />contractors, especially with the pending tip fee increase. Presently separation activity is limited by <br />available land on which to conduct wood separation operations, limited savings to the contractor for <br />separating materials for multiple hauls, and limited information among builders about the fee. In <br />addition, there has been some uneven administration of the fee az the landfill due to uncertainty <br />about acceptance of certain engineered wood waste products and periodic inclusion of small <br />amounts of non-wood wastes in loads that are supposed to be wood only. If a differential fee were <br />applied and enforced as part of a solid waste plan, the volume of wood wastes could increase to the <br />point that more landfill site supervision would be required to ensure removal of any painted or <br />treated wood. <br />NOTE: Our incentive program for diversion of roofing shingles was successful in diverting 134 <br />tons of torn-off roofing shingles from the waste stream by offering a fee of $20 per ton instead of <br />$31 but the anticipated market did not materialize. The shingles are now being stockpiled offsite by <br />the grinding contractor. Discussions with the State Waste Management Office and the Department <br />of Transportation have led us to believe that near-term efforts to include shingles in paving produce <br />will be limited to post-industrial scrap from shingle factories. Testing and further evaluation is <br />required by asphalt manufacturing facilities before considering use of roofing scrap. Scrap from re- <br />roofing has too variable an asphalt content, may still contain some asbestos, and has too many nails- <br />and other contaminants to wan~ant serious market consideration az this time. <br />2. Solid Waste Planning <br />The Town of Chapel Hill has adopted a solid waste management plan requirement as part of its <br />development ordinance. This ordinance stipulates that applicants for a special use permit or zoning <br />compliance permit, in the Town of Chapel Hill and its planning jurisdictions and only for projecu <br />larger than single family or duplex dwellings, must complete a solid waste management plan. The <br />plan requires developers to address management of various wastes generated during construction, <br />opportunities to use materials with recycled content and how the new development will <br />accommodate recycling once it is operational. <br />There is limited ability to enforce the ordinance once the permit is granted. Enforcement could be <br />more effective as part of the building inspection process. <br />With the exception of solid-sawn wood scrap, there are no markets available in Orange County <br />unless we build a facility for the separated construction waste materials. Consequently little waste <br />reduction has been observed. on construction sites despite the Town of Chapel Hill's plan <br />requirement. However local builders, developers and architects report that, due to the plan <br />requirements, they have increased their understanding of the potential benefits of these measures <br />and of the availability of construction materials with recycled content. <br />Over the past four months, landfill staff has worked with other local government staff and there is <br />consensus that further consideration should be given to development of a solid waste plan <br />ordinance for all jurisdictions. Plan enforcement could be by a solid waste enforcement officer who <br />could oversee solid waste management plans throughout the county, should each jurisdiction adopt <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.