Orange County NC Website
S <br />,~ ~ d <br />valid sampling (subject to the permission and cooperation of the owners) of the water supply wells in the <br />neighborhoods adjacent to or near the landfill, can be subjected to an initial screening for VOC <br />contamination. The azeas or neighborhoods screened may also be limited to those which lie in the <br />direction of leachate plume movement indicated in the Buxton landfill leachate report. Regazdless of the <br />sampling program, the initial screening process can be undertaken by the County's Environmental <br />Health staff (with the concurrence of the Orange County Boazd of Health) or by some private sector <br />consultant with water sampling expertise and laboratory water quality analysis capabilities. Those wells <br />which show no VOC contamination, even if the presence of iron or naturally occurring metals aze <br />detected, can be reasonably assumed to be currently unaffected by any constituent of landfill reachate. <br />In the event that one or more of the wells tested show evidence of VOC contamination, the presence of <br />one or more VOC compounds may indicate contamination by landfill leachate. As there aze other <br />sources of VOC contamination, including very localized contamination of well water through surface <br />water infiltration and inflow into improperly constructed wells, all- wells showing VOC contamination <br />would be cazefully re-examined. Older wells or those for which no accurate well construction <br />information exists could also be examined by means of inserting a video camera into the well. New <br />water samples from contaminated wells would be acquired and tested both to confirm the VOC results of <br />the initial screening test and to look for the presence of tracer materials or elements such as boron and <br />detergents or other indicators. Presence of these tracer materials or indicators, which are not naturally <br />occurring in this azea but aze commonly associated with highly mobile components of landfill leachate, <br />would be a strong indication of contamination by landfill leachate. If landfill leachate contamination <br />were confirmed in one or more wells, other wells located in a pattern radiating outwazd from the landfill <br />and the contaminated well(s) would be tested to try to define the size and direction of the leachate <br />plume. The information could then be used to help determine: 1) if and where an extension of a <br />municipal water distribution network would be justified to overcome landfill related water quality <br />problems: and 2) if associated costs could be chazged as landfill operation related expenses. The cost of <br />the testing program, if undertaken by County Environmental Health staff with lab work for the initial <br />screening provided by the state environmental health lab, is estimated to be approximately $30,000. The <br />cost of a similaz testing program undertaken by private consultants and labs is estimated to be <br />approximately $70,000. <br />There aze a number of caveats that aze applicable to the strategy outlined above. The primary <br />assumption that provides for the savings in the County Environmental Health controlled testing program <br />is that there aze very few, if any, existing wells that aze contaminated with landfill leachate. Each of the <br />initial screening tests conducted by the state lab will cost in the $100 to $150 range. Follow-up testing <br />by a private lab capable of detecting boron or other indicators will cost as much as $400 to $500 per <br />sample. Video inspection of wells also costs approximately $500 per well. If more than ten percent of <br />the wells screened (assuming 140 wells initially screened) require additional testing or inspection, the <br />final costs would rise very quickly. It is assumed that a private firm would chazge $500 each for <br />sampling and testing each well and that there would be no initial screening process as the boron and <br />other indicators would be tested for in the initial analyses. There aze three other potential caveats that <br />have been cited by Ron Holdway, Director of the County's Environmental Health Section. The first is <br />that there is a conceivable liability involved in an invasive inspection (video) of wells where there is a <br />potential for actual or perceived damage to the well or its piping, wiring or pump. The second is that <br />participation in the testing and inspection process by the Environmental Health Section could result in <br />some sort of enforcement action related to observed septic tank system malfunctions at any housing or <br />