Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-10-1998 - Attachment 3k
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 02-10-1998
>
Agenda - 02-10-1998 - Attachment 3k
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2010 3:52:43 PM
Creation date
7/23/2010 3:51:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/10/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
Attachment 3k
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19980210
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br />`l1~QC.rzvnmff' ~~ <br />1 <br />Possible Solid Waste Management Scenarios <br />Orange County Commissioners Work Session <br />October 30, 1997 <br />1. County responsible county-wide <br />• Staff <br />• Siting of MRF, Landfill, Transfer Station, etc. <br />• Control of Assets <br />• Seek long-term customers within Orange County <br />• Advisory Board ' <br />• Enterprise <br />2. Pursue #1 but have Chapel Hill operate present landfill for its life; <br />County pursue #1 for new solid waste operations by year 2003 <br />• Enterprise <br />• should LOG be formalized with a charge, revisions to the existing interlocal agreement, etc? <br />3. Plan only for unincorporated areas of Orange County and seek existing or new partnerships <br />• Enterprise <br />4. Implement solid waste plan <br />what would be required? ' <br />• What organizational structure <br />• Staff <br />• Solid waste operations <br />• Open to technology and new recycling efforts <br />• Board of County Commissioners directly responsible <br />• No Advisory Board <br />• Enterprise <br />5. Tweak LOG model <br />Pursue majority of jurisdictions not total consensus on important issues - "N -1" have to agree <br />• Enterprise <br />• should LOG be formalized with a charge, revisions to the existing interlocal agreement, etc? <br />6. Ask Carrboro, Chapel Hill, or Hillsborough to operate and take the lead <br />• Enterprise <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.