Browse
Search
Minutes - 19870824
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Minutes - 19870824
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2013 8:15:19 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:52:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/24/1987
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-" -- ' i <br />He concluded that he felt the failure to grant the rezoning <br />request for Autowerks would constitute spot zoning. <br />Chuck Miller , co-owner of Autowerks, indicated the owner of the <br />property would be willing to sell the portion of the property on which <br />Autowerks is located if the rezoning request is approved. He indicated <br />that the desire is to make improvements to the business with one (6,000 to <br />7,000 square ft.) building in order to accommodate more than one <br />automobile at the same time. <br />THERE BEING NO FURTHER COMMENTS, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell and seconded by Commissioner <br />Carey to refer this item to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be <br />considered by the Board of Commissioners on October 5, 1987. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br />c. Chandler Concrete Com an <br />Planner Greg Szymik presented for the receipt of public comments a <br />proposed rezoning request by Chandler Concrete Company. <br />The property is located in western Cheeks Township on the south <br />side of US 70 and on the north side of Southern Railway. This 3.43 acre <br />parcel is approximately 860 feet east of the intersection of Frazier Road <br />(SR 1310) and US Highway 70. <br />The Land Use Plan designation is Commercial-Industrial Ten-Year <br />Transition. The current zoning of the property is Residential-1 with an <br />overlay district of Protected Watershed II in the Seven Mile Creek <br />Watershed. Adjacent land uses include the railroad, utilities and <br />industry. <br />The request has been made for rezoning to Community Commercial- <br />III. <br />The Planning Staff recommends against rezoning of the property <br />from Residential-1 to Community Commercial-3. <br />The property is located in a Protected Watershed II overlay <br />district and is proposed for non-residential use. A planned development <br />approach, including site plan approval and the issuance of a Special Use <br />Permit provides better control over such development in a watershed. <br />Planning Board Chair Jacobs asked for an explanation of the <br />changed conditions in the findings of fact. Szymik responded that the <br />allegation is that the land uses in the general area are compatible with <br />those in CC-3 zoning. There is EC-5 zoning on property to the west .and E- <br />T on property to the east. Since there are existing commercial and <br />industrial activities in the area, this property is no longer suitable for <br />residential purposes. <br />Mr. Thomas Chandler president Chandler Concrete Company, stated <br />his desire to have the property zoned CC-3 primarily for the storage of <br />excess plant equipment such as bins and hoppers. None of the equipment <br />stored would be mobile and could only by moved with the aid of a crane. <br />He noted that Planning Staff had recommended that he apply for a CC-3 <br />zoning which would be proper for the use he intended. He continued that <br />at no time had Staff indicated to him that CC-3 was inappropriate or that <br />they would not recommend approval of the requested rezoning. He noted <br />that he felt all of the documentation was supportive of a CC-3 zoning <br />classification. Mr. Chandler presented a map showing the location of his <br />property and indicated that the majority of surrounding properties are <br />industrial. He indicated that there was no water course across the <br />property and the proposed use does not present a problem of water <br />pollution to the reservoir. He addressed documentation included in the <br />agenda which indicated a CC-3 rezoning would be appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.