Agenda - 02-17-1998 - 9c - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

23 2. The three-acre parcel is capable of adequately accommodating an individual well and septic system. 3. .The property fronts for 198 feet along the east side of US 86 North which is .+ designated as an Arterial Road in the Transportation Element. Daily motor vehicles counts are 9,000 ADT about 4,000 feet to the south of the property and 7,800 ADT at the Phelps Road intersection 12,000 feet (2 1/4 miles) to the north. Public Hearing Summary A joint public hearing on the zoning request was head by the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Boazd on November 24, 1997. Commissioner Halkiotis inquired about an area where a dam is located and it was described by staff. The Planning Board Chair and a neighbor of the subject property inquired about the planned use of the property if it were rezoned Staff stated that any of the uses list by right, or allowed after receiving a Special Use Permit, in the I-1 zoning district would be possible. This list of uses is an attachment to these minutes on pages Sind the public hearing, written comments have been received and were distributed to Board members (copies attached to these minutes on pages ). Cameron stated that the concerns in the four letters speak to drainage, traffic and other impacts to adjacent properties. There is no use proposed at this time. Using a map, Cameron indicated the drainage pattern, noting that it drains to the east and there is a larger creek 300 feet east of this property. There is also drainage flowing in a swale to the south of the property that joins the larger creek to the east, but neither of those affects this property. Cameron noted that when a site plan is presented, erosion control, and buffer requirements will be applied to insure that all impacts will be addressed. Planrtiag Staffrecommends approval of the rezoning request for the Chang property to I-I, as delineated on the map (attachment on page )and the findings (attachment to these minutes on pages ). Barrows asked about the performance standards. Cameron responded that buffers, screening, and noise levels will be determined and applied whey a use is ProP~ Searles expressed concern that once buffer were applied, there would not be sufficient area for use. Cameron responded that the Zoning Ordinance includes waiver provisions fa the reduction of buffers under terrain conditions. . Katz noted that one of tha letters referred to adverse impacts firom a green house and it was not listed as a permitted use. Cameron responded that it is considered an agcicutttual use and is permitted in as AR district. - Katz asked abate the dtaionage concerns mentioned in otu otthe letter: in - reference to storage of petroleum produces. Cameron r+espoaded that the Fire Code requires containment strttctura is case of accidental spills.