Browse
Search
Minutes - 19870625
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Minutes - 19870625
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2013 4:43:49 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:51:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/25/1987
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i~~8 <br />p~ <br />a <br />5~ <br />a <br />a <br />~..~ _ <br />d <br />;- <br />a <br />J <br />v <br />0 <br />z <br />a <br />z <br />U <br />0 <br />x <br />z <br />c <br />n <br />z <br />e <br /> <br />1 ~c~B <br />Board of Commissioners 1?age Two <br />June 12,1987 <br />that term is defined under the Animal Welfare Act. <br />This procedure, involving the magistrate, is a <br />streamlined procedure which should be used whenever <br />possible. I do, however, recommend that the Animal <br />Cruelty Investigators work together with the Animal <br />Control Officers. In this regard, T recommend that <br />Section XIII, paragraph A include language which <br />creates this in--tandem relationship. Anew sentence <br />can be added to accomplish this purpose as follows: <br />All investigations of reported or observed animal <br />cruelty or animal abuse shall be the joint <br />responsibility of and shall be jointly carried out by <br />the Animal Cruelty Investigatars and the Animal Contral <br />Officers of Orange County. Likewise, I recommend that <br />Section VIIIE.1 read as follows: <br />1. Have the responsibility along with law <br />enforcement agencies and where applicable with <br />Animal Cruelty Investigators to enforce... <br />3. The provision in Section V, paragraph B <br />providing for policies or procedures which allow the <br />reduction of or waiver of fees "for individuals who are <br />unable by reason of financial hardship to pay the <br />required fees," causes me concern. Although laudable, <br />its administration may prove burdensome and it creates <br />a risk of arbitrariness. I'm also concerned that the <br />standard "financial hardship" is not a workable <br />ordinance standard. I would prefer that the County <br />establish the financial hardship standard in the <br />ordinance if a reduced rate or fee waiver provision is <br />deemed necessary-by the Board. <br />4. I recommend that Section VI read as follows: <br />Section VI -- Ordinance. All other Orange <br />County ordinances in conflict with this ordinance <br />are hereby repealed to the extent of such <br />.conflict. The Ordinance to Provide far Animal <br />Control and Protection in Orange County, adopted <br />May 15, 1979, as amended October 3, 1983, is <br />hereby repealed. - <br />5. I recommend that Definition No. 8 in Section <br />VII in the last clause be warded as follows: <br />•:s .i <br />`.` <br />I <br />;,:~ <br />or any person owning or keeping 15 or more <br />animals, excluding domesticated livestock, each of <br />which is four months of age or older. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.