Orange County NC Website
- -:-~~ <br />Subcommittee of the TJCOG Regional Image Task Force. ~~~ <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br />7. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTIONS <br />--. Collins presented two situations in which two applicants requested <br />a variance to subdivide acreage into lots less than the two acre minimum. <br />The first applicant David Ripperton was granted a variance-and the second <br />applicant Habitat for Humanity was not granted a variance. <br />After a lengthly discussion, the Board decided not to take any <br />action on this .item. <br />8. CABLE T.V, ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS - SECOND READING <br />(A copy of the amended ordinance is in the official Ordinance Book <br />in the Clerk's office). <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner <br />Carey to approve the amendments to the Cable Television Ordinance as <br />presented and contained in the Ordinance. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br />9. PROPOSED ALERT CABLE ORDINANCE FRANCHISING AMENDMENTS - FIRST <br />READING (A copy of the amendment is in the July 6 permanent agenda file.) <br />Commissioner Hartwell asked that the Ordinance be specific in <br />three areas: (1) amount of main trunk cable to be constructed, (2) the <br />schedule for construction of this cable, and (3) its adequacy to serve the <br />unincorporated areas of the County. He suggested that Alert provide to <br />the County by December 31, 1987 a detailed map and schedule of the .trunk <br />lane they will. construct and an engineering report demonstrating that this <br />.trunk cable is constructed to meet the requirements of the Franchise and <br />that the construction schedule be apportioned in such a way that by <br />December 31, 1993 that it all be built. <br />i Mr. Norman"Vogel, Chair of the. Cable T.V. Task Force stated that <br />what Commissioner Hartwell suggested is what was proposed when cable <br />service was first contemplated for Orange County. <br />Doug Keel of Alert Cable questioned the definition of overbuild <br />and the fact that there is no relief of an overbuild requirement which <br />means that anywhere Carolina has laid trunk cable, Alert is obligated to <br />build trunk over the top of that already there. He stated that a company <br />cannot make that kind of investment without some kind of potential return <br />on that investment. <br />Keel suggested that a requirement be included in the ordinance <br />whereby any cable operator would have to submit to the County Manager <br />annually a map showing what is proposed to be built in the upcoming year. <br />It is difficult to project five years and know what the density may be in <br />any given area. <br />Vogel concurred that it is extremely difficult to plan five years <br />in the future and agreed with submitting a plan annually. <br />After further discussion it was decided to amend No. 1 on page 8 <br />to read "all such main trunk cables shall be built in accordance with a <br />confident"ial detailed map, schedule and engineering plan to be supplied by <br />the grantee prior to December 31, 1987. This plan will demonstrate the <br />adequacy of the trunk cable to meet the franchise requirements in the <br />unincorporated areas of the County and will apportion construction of the <br />trunk mileage equally by year so as to bring about completion prior to <br />December 31, 1993. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner <br />Halkxotis to approve the first reading of the Ordinance as amended. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br />10. PROPOSED CAROLINA CABLE ORDINANCE FRANCHISING AMENDMENTS - FIRST <br />READING (A copy of the amendment is in the July 5 permanent agenda file.) <br />