Orange County NC Website
line would carry up to 1700 gallons per minute which is what was analyzed <br />as the extended future growth of the Efland area through the year 200,4.. <br />Commissioner Willhoit confirmed that the commitment from Hillsborough <br />was 380,000 gallons per day which can be carried with the 8" sewer line ~"•~, <br />which was the original design intended for the project. <br />Chair Marshall asked how many of .the original people that the County <br />is committed to serve are not included in this first. phase and Bill Laws <br />noted that the main project would serve approximately 100 of those people <br />who the County is committed to serve. <br />Commissioner Hartwell spoke in support of buying the 10" pipe because <br />of the difficulty in replacing big pipe .and because of the possibility of <br />,future growth in the corridor west of Efland. _ <br />Chair Marshall stated that the 8" pipe would give some flexibility <br />for the County to design and do what needs to be done as the area <br />develops, whereas if more capacity is put into the Hillsborough water <br />treatment plant than they have agreed to would present more pressure upon <br />the County to pick up their infrastructure cost. <br />Commissioner Willhoit noted that Lake Ben Johnson is not vital to the <br />long range water needs of the area -- it is just a holding pond with no <br />capacity. He restated what the engineer said in that the 8" line is <br />sufficient to provide that service. Its a question of saving $27,000 <br />over a period of ten years at an expenditure of $65,000. <br />In answer to a question from Commissioner Halkiotis, Thompson stated <br />that there are three hosiery plants that have expressed an interest in <br />connecting onto the sewer line. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis expressed agreement with the 10" line and <br />Kevin Carter, Project Engineer recommended the 10" line. This would <br />provide for the future growth in the Efland area. <br />Commissioner Hartwell pointed out that Senate Bill 2 would pay half <br />the cost of the difference between the 8" and 10" line. <br />Gordon Saker stated that option 3 with the 10" line would cost an <br />additional $16,000 to $17,.000. <br />Chair Marshall stated that the Board's design for this system was <br />specifically at the Lowest level to keep the smallest amount of effluent <br />flowing through the force main with the idea that something would have to <br />be done along a gravity sewer line in the long run if the cost was to <br />remain low. <br />It was pointed out that if everyone along the sewer line were to <br />connect on that only 55,000 gallons out of 380,000 would be used which <br />leaves plenty of room for growth. <br />Commissioner Willhoit emphasized that everything should be done to <br />hold the cost down making it affordable to those who will be using the <br />system. <br />Chair Marshall stated that if a lot of development takes place in _- <br />this area, the revenues from impact fees will be available to design and <br />change the system over to a gravity system which i.s what will be needed to <br />save any money. <br />