Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-14-1998 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 04-14-1998
>
Agenda - 04-14-1998 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2013 3:22:40 PM
Creation date
7/20/2010 10:54:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/14/1998
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19980414
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U"Taw W. Broww.. Chair <br />suphea K Heaiot* K" CAMW <br />M"M Cara, .rr <br />MMM L Croaker <br />Arke K Cordow <br />Orange County Commissioners <br />P. O. Box 8181 <br />200 S Cameron Street <br />Hillsborough, NC 2 72 78 <br />February 20, 1998 <br />The Honorable Rosemary L. Waldorf <br />Mayor, Town of Chapel Hill <br />306 North Columbia Street <br />Chapel Hill, NC 27516 <br />Dear Rosemary: <br />ATTACHMENT 4 <br />ice= <br />\�r <br />During our February I0, 1998 work session, the Board of Commissioners discussed the <br />proposed community benefits to the neighborhoods around the Eubanks Road Landfill. The <br />Board reached consensus on a number of conclusions and/or recommendations concerning <br />those of the proposed fourteen community benefits not already addressed by the local <br />governments in Orange County. The following letter outlines the results of our discussion, <br />and in many cases, solicits your board's views about our conclusions/recommendations. <br />Also note Attachments 1 -14, which provide a concise summary of the status, as we <br />understand it, of each of the- fourteen proposed community benefits. <br />A. Benefit #1 -Water Extensions: Well Testing and Use of LOG Funds <br />1. The Board of Commissioners confirmed its view that sewer line extensions should not be <br />considered as a community benefit because no direct or indirect impact from the landfill <br />related to a need for sewer service has been identified, and because of their prohibitive <br />cost. Does your jurisdiction share that view? <br />2. Testing data,from drinking water wells throughout Orange County indicates that water <br />quality imweUs:in the vicinity of the Eubanks Road Landfill is not dissimilar to that in <br />wells elsevyice'in the County (see Attachment i A). Does your governing board interpret <br />the data in the same way? <br />3. Based on water testing, the County Engineer's review of potential blasting impacts and <br />technical reports received to date (see Attachments 1B. 1C, and 1D), there does not seem <br />to be a causative relationship between landfill operations and water quality concerns that <br />led to the proposal to extend water lines. How does your jurisdiction view this <br />assessment? <br />You Count In Orange County <br />AREA CODE (919) 732 -8181: 968 -4501 : 688 -7331 : 227 -2031: FAX (919) 644-3004 <br />F-7d. 2130 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.