Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-14-1998 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 04-14-1998
>
Agenda - 04-14-1998 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2013 3:22:40 PM
Creation date
7/20/2010 10:54:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/14/1998
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19980414
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />2. Financing of other solid waste operations should remain tipping fee based, to the maximum <br />extent possible. As needed, supplemental revenue from user fees, solid waste availability fees, <br />solid waste service district(s), or the like could be considered. <br />3. Legislative changes by the General Assembly should be sought if needed to make <br />permissible the best combination of financing mechanisms. <br />4. Should Orange County assume overall solid waste management responsibility, the County <br />general fund would not underwrite overall solid waste operations or be a source of supplemental <br />revenue. <br />5. Costs of proposed community benefits that cannot legally be borne by the Landfill Fund <br />should be shared by the jurisdictions (for example, on the basis of ownership stake in the <br />landfill) - if not through property taxes, then perhaps through sales taxes. The towns have <br />suggested that the County bear the costs through bonds. Impact of this on County debt structure <br />would need to be considered. <br />6. Indirect cost charges to the Landfill Fund should the County assume solid waste operations <br />would likely be higher. It appears that the Town of Chapel Hill has not been fully reimbursed <br />over the years for its cost of administering solid waste operations. An outside consultant should <br />be retained to do an impartial analysis of the indirect costs that should be reimbursed to the <br />County if it assumed overall responsibility. <br />7. Landfill funds would need to be budgeted for planning of new solid waste operations related <br />to a materials recovery facility (MRF), transfer station, new landfill, or the like(depending on <br />which processing and disposal mechanisms are ultimately selected. <br />8. If a decision were made to consider a new landfill site, it should be done through a proactive <br />search proces§ that solicits voluntary sale of property, and not through a process that would lead <br />to condemnation of property for a new landfill. <br />9. There will be additional operating costs above the current level during the period of <br />overlap when both current landfill operations continue and future solid waste management <br />activities (whatever they may be) are phased in. <br />B. Administration of Solid Waste Operations <br />If the County assumes overall solid waste management, the Town of Chapel Hill Solid Waste <br />Department would be transferred in its entirety and become a new County department. The existing <br />Solid Waste Management Director would become a County department head, reporting directly to <br />the County Manager. This position, paid by the landfill fund, would have a working title of <br />Assistant to the Manager for Solid Waste. <br />Organization <br />Attachment 1 shows the current organization for the Town of Chapel Hill Solid Waste <br />Department. The department is made up of two main areas: Landfill operations and recycling. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.