Orange County NC Website
�� <br /> *�K� � <br /> �� <br /> ` <br /> Chair Margaret Brown asked if this project could bedone in phases doing such items mathe seats, electrical, <br /> lighting and sound separately. Bill Mullins said that they tried that and it did not work for this facility. The total cost of <br /> the project will ha$1.D6O.UOO. The original estimate in1BQB was$6OO.OUO. <br /> Commissioner Ha|kioUo made reference to the project manegerpooiUonforbothaohoo| oysbsnna. He feels <br /> the County needs to help both school systems with providing this service. Ho feels that the manager needs bm sit down <br /> with the superintendents and talk with them about this possibility. <br /> Chair Margaret Brown emphasized that when there iso bid that io over what io budgeted, the school system <br /> needs bo meet with the County Commissioners to find o viable solution. <br /> A motion was made bv Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Gordon toapprove arovioed <br /> capital project ordinancaaoinmorpouatedbyna#wranoeintheeenninubsafbrnonovabonobotheCu|tuna|AdnBuUdingat <br /> Chapel Hill High School <br /> Commissioner Halkiotis suggested and Chair Brown agreed that there needs to be a monthly meeting <br /> between the County Manager and the superintendents since 50%of our budget goes to the schools. A printed agenda <br /> would be shared with the County Commissioners. John Link agreed with this suggestion. <br /> The Board amended this motion instructing the County Manager b/meet with the superintendents and talk <br /> about all the projects theyhaveonthebooks. This would send clear expectations from the County Commissioners to <br /> the School Boards. <br /> Commissioner Carey does not feel that the County Commissioners should try to find the money for overruns <br /> but that the respective school systems should be responsible to come up with the funds or cut back on the project. <br /> Chair Margaret Brown would like bo have some priorities set sovve understand what really needs tmbedone. <br /> It would help her to have a book with each building showing the renovations that have been made and what renovations <br /> need bzbadone. <br /> Vote on the motion with the amendment: UNANIMOUS <br /> b. 1998-2008 CIP Adoption <br /> Th� Bcard considered adoption of the 1G8G-2DO8 Capital Investment Plan. <br /> At the May 19 meeting, the Board approved the allocation of$100,000 for farmland preservation, held in <br /> reserve in the 1998-99 CIP, pending adoption of a conservation easement program specific to Orange County. The . <br /> Board also approved a decision to proceed with a$4.8 million private placement loan to carry out major nanoxaUonoat <br /> the Whitted and Northern Human Services Centers, and to replace the Chapel Hill Senior Center. The Board indicated <br /> its intention to discuss at its next meeting the options available for funding the debt service on that private placement <br /> loan. <br /> Budget Director Donna Dean distributed a chart which shows the County capital projects and what would <br /> happen with the continuation of the one cent setaside for school/park land acquisition and what would happen if itionot <br /> continued. <br /> Commissioner Gordon made reference to her comprehensive program for resource conservation which <br /> would use this one cent eotosida. She noted that Orange County has not spent very much on the environment over the <br /> last ten years. She feels it is not fair to pit county conservation against county buildings and that people in the County <br /> want them to put dollars toward the environment. She asked that the County Commissioners have a work session to <br /> discuss this issue further. She asked that this one cent setaside for land acquisition stay intact and that the County look <br /> elsewhere for monies for County buildings. <br /> Commissioner Carey said that he feels Orange County is doing more than most counties in the state in <br /> prptectin0our environment through land use regulations. Ha does not want to see the needs of our County buildings <br /> which serve County citizens delayed. It is the County's responsibility to upgrade and improve County buildings and he is <br /> not prepared to cut County projects. <br /> Commissioner Crowther aupportstheCountyKAanager'o proposal to formally adopt the 1808-2ODBC|P. less <br /> any specific projects thcdtheBoardmnayidenbfvasnmedingfudberde|ibemabonduhn0Juna1Q9Gbudgatxvorhsmsoiono. <br /> John Link said that environmental issues and county projects are competing for funds. He asked that the <br /> Board consider this eoa revenue stream and asked that they direct the staff to fund the needs that are necessary. <br /> The Board has o full year for reallocating these monies. <br /> Chair Margaret Brown said that these are modest sums for maintaining our County buildings and making <br /> them serviceable. She also supports a comprehensive approach for environmental issues that need to be addressed. <br /> She would like to keep supporting this fund and hopefully do both things. <br /> Commissioner Ho|kjoUo does not support the$G million for Information technology. With reference bn <br /> County bui|dinga, he said that the County has taken better care of the school buildings than our own. <br /> A motion was made bv Commissioner Crowther, seconded bv Commissioner Ha/kioUshm retain and <br /> continue the one cent mataaide for school/park capital reserve for one year. The decision on what hodo with the reserve <br /> fund after one year will bo made later. <br />